Re: ReadDateFormat

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21811
interpreted = N
texte = >I developed my date code on webcat 2.x, before the ReadDateFormat >preference ever existed. From what you're saying, it seems that if you >simply remove this preference from the WebCatalog Prefs file, webcat 3.x >defaults to some internal code that still allows my external webdna code >to work properly.>Therefore, it appears that there is some common internal date code in both >2.x and 3.x, but that code cannot be used in 3.x *unless* you remove the >ReadDateFormat preference. If you leave it in, webcat uses the new >internal code, and that new code may have a bug in it that prevents my >date stuff from working properly. > >PCS will surely have more information about this theory ...Thanks Ken for your answer. I think it's a bug. I really hope we'll get more information from PCS, and I wish to know if I can drop the RedDateFormat line from the preference file without any obscure consequence.Helene Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (John Hill 1998)
  2. Re: ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  3. Re: ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  4. Re: ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  5. Re: ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (helene 1998)
  6. Re: ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (PCS Technical Support 1998)
  7. ReadDateFormat bug in 3.x (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  8. Re: ReadDateFormat (helene 1998)
  9. Re: ReadDateFormat (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  10. Re: ReadDateFormat (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  11. Re: ReadDateFormat (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  12. ReadDateFormat (helene 1998)
  13. ReadDateFormat bug in 3.0.1 (Grant Hulbert 1998)
>I developed my date code on webcat 2.x, before the ReadDateFormat >preference ever existed. From what you're saying, it seems that if you >simply remove this preference from the WebCatalog Prefs file, webcat 3.x >defaults to some internal code that still allows my external webdna code >to work properly.>Therefore, it appears that there is some common internal date code in both >2.x and 3.x, but that code cannot be used in 3.x *unless* you remove the >ReadDateFormat preference. If you leave it in, webcat uses the new >internal code, and that new code may have a bug in it that prevents my >date stuff from working properly. > >PCS will surely have more information about this theory ...Thanks Ken for your answer. I think it's a bug. I really hope we'll get more information from PCS, and I wish to know if I can drop the RedDateFormat line from the preference file without any obscure consequence.Helene helene

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

RE: Missing contexts on NT (1997) New Command prefs ... (1997) Add a field to the error log? (1997) Part Html part WebDNA (1997) possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997) Pieces Show Up! Curse You! (2000) japanese characters (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Sending PGP Mail from WebCatalog (2000) Kaaaaahhhhhhhnnnnnnn! (1997) A dynamic database. (1997) [WebDNA] configuring 5.1 with apache 2? (2008) [WebDNA] WebDNA v7 linux setup with Lighttpd (2011) Checkboxes (1997) ODBC on Solaris for WebCat. . . (2001) WebStar Secure on other machine (1997) Append..... doesn't (2000) Log-in Scheme (2003) Security for malls with different webmasters (1998) Dummy Credit Card Number for debug? (1997)