Re: Mac OS X Server, Apache etc etc
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1999
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 22330
interpreted = N
texte = >If you will support Mac OS X in the near future, will the upgrade price be>as >steep as the 2.x - 3.x upgrade?>I'm right in the middle of evaluating the purchase of another copy of>WebCat or some other e-commerce/database solution and these are issues>which weigh heavily on my mind.>Has anyone evaluated WebCat versus WebObjects?? Care to share some thoughts?We have deeply tried a lot of solutions. WEBCAT is simply the best, believe me.I am always surprised when I hear, from a professionnel developer, theWEBCAT price is steep. A serious project and the investment cost isabsorbed several times.Think this way and you'll get the best from your choice of WEBCAT as adevelopment tool.And if you really want to compare, have a look at Microsoft eCommercesolution, for example. We have winned a project against a company using it,because we have developed very quicky a prototype, we have offered a betterprice (and still very profitable for us) and without even using all thefeatures of WEBCAT we have furnished a solution exactly as the clientwanted it.So we decided to use MAC X only if PCS will develop a version for it. Imean the first criteria is WEBCAT and not the Mac OS.A last word about the costs. There are two costs when using a developmentsystem. The investment itself and the hidden costs. In the case of WEBCAT,the hidden costs are ZERO. Hard to tell the same thing about anotherproduct?Helene
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>If you will support Mac OS X in the near future, will the upgrade price be>as >steep as the 2.x - 3.x upgrade?>I'm right in the middle of evaluating the purchase of another copy of>WebCat or some other e-commerce/database solution and these are issues>which weigh heavily on my mind.>Has anyone evaluated WebCat versus WebObjects?? Care to share some thoughts?We have deeply tried a lot of solutions. WEBCAT is simply the best, believe me.I am always surprised when I hear, from a professionnel developer, theWEBCAT price is steep. A serious project and the investment cost isabsorbed several times.Think this way and you'll get the best from your choice of WEBCAT as adevelopment tool.And if you really want to compare, have a look at Microsoft eCommercesolution, for example. We have winned a project against a company using it,because we have developed very quicky a prototype, we have offered a betterprice (and still very profitable for us) and without even using all thefeatures of WEBCAT we have furnished a solution exactly as the clientwanted it.So we decided to use MAC X only if PCS will develop a version for it. Imean the first criteria is WEBCAT and not the Mac OS.A last word about the costs. There are two costs when using a developmentsystem. The investment itself and the hidden costs. In the case of WEBCAT,the hidden costs are ZERO. Hard to tell the same thing about anotherproduct?Helene
helene
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2: multiple currency support (1997)
Questions To Answer (1997)
test - ignore (2008)
How do I get WebCatalog to interpret WebDNA tags in .html files? (1997)
Expected behavior? (1998)
Running _every_ page through WebCat-error.html (1997)
dont want to use credit card authorisation yet (2000)
displaying New products (using [date]) (1997)
Auto conversion of URLs? (1998)
Latest compatible Apache (2006)
Secure server question (1997)
the comparison character \ (2000)
[input] [/input] (1997)
NTbeta18 corrupted? (1997)
I have observed and I am gone. (1998)
pc (1997)
[WebDNA] Encrypted Templates - Includes (2014)
WebDNA 5.0 Enterprise Edition (2003)
Closing Databases (1998)
Clear command and ShoppingCart.tmpl (1997)