Re: Couple of questions

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 22895
interpreted = N
texte = >> This is misleading in the docs; where we say anonymous we really mean >> admin group. > >That does not make sense. You mean I have to make them part of the admin >group in order for them to append a record to their own database? That >means they will have the same privileges I will for any page on my >server. Am I not understanding something here? I just want people who >are not in *any* group to be prevented from appending, but if they do >belong to a group I have configured, they should be permitted to modify >their own database.This only applies to the Append/Replace/Delete *commands*. You can always use embedded [Append] contexts on a page that is protected with [protect customgroup] to get any kind of security levels you like.Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Couple of questions (PCS Technical Support 1999)
  2. Re: Couple of questions (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  3. Re: Couple of questions (Gil Poulsen 1999)
  4. Re: Couple of questions (PCS Technical Support 1999)
  5. Re: Couple of questions (PCS Technical Support 1999)
  6. Couple of questions II (Gil Poulsen 1999)
  7. Couple of questions II (Gil Poulsen 1999)
  8. Couple of questions (Gil Poulsen 1999)
  9. Couple of questions (Gil Poulsen 1999)
  10. Couple of questions (Gil Poulsen 1999)
  11. Couple of questions (Gil Poulsen 1999)
>> This is misleading in the docs; where we say anonymous we really mean >> admin group. > >That does not make sense. You mean I have to make them part of the admin >group in order for them to append a record to their own database? That >means they will have the same privileges I will for any page on my >server. Am I not understanding something here? I just want people who >are not in *any* group to be prevented from appending, but if they do >belong to a group I have configured, they should be permitted to modify >their own database.This only applies to the Append/Replace/Delete *commands*. You can always use embedded [append] contexts on a page that is protected with [protect customgroup] to get any kind of security levels you like.Technical Support | ==== eCommerce and Beyond ==== Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebMerchant, 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court | SiteEdit Pro, PhotoMaster, San Diego, CA 92128 | Typhoon 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com/ PCS Technical Support

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997) Snake Bites (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA Roll Call (2013) New Weird Behavior (bug report) (2000) [WebDNA] How to code a 301 redirect (2008) no global [username] or [password] displayed ... (1997) Highlighting words found in a keyword search (2003) New public beta available (1997) one item in several different categories? (2000) [defined]ish (1997) StartAT and shownext (2000) WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) [WebDNA] Privat IP website behind a public IP website (2014) OS X permissions to write to Globals directory (2003) emailer (1997) TCP Connect (2000) Comments in db? (1997) Online Docs for the Beta... (2000) Re:Problem displaying search result (1997) [ListFiles] & [loop] (1998)