Re: Grouping Fields in Context
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1999
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 24639
interpreted = N
texte = >If I use the field name quote1 in the found items, it will only pull in >the specific field I call, correct? So, in other words, it won't randomly >pull in a quote from any of the other fields (quote2, quote3, quote4). Can I >not accomplish what I am trying to accomplish by grouping fields?Searching for the data and displaying it are two separate things. I think your searching is OK. There isn't a magic way to display just the field that contained the match for your search. However, there are a few ways of doing it:[founditems] [quote1][quote2][quote3]... [/founditems][founditems] [showif [url][quote1][/url]^[url][search_data][/url]][quote1][/showif] [showif [url][quote2][/url]^[url][search_data][/url]][quote2][/showif] [showif [url][quote3][/url]^[url][search_data][/url]][quote3][/showif]... [/founditems]P.S. I did notice that your [search] in the original message was missing a GROUP1data=[search_data] parameter.John.--------------------------------- John A. Hill Smith Micro Software Internet Solutions Division eCommerce / Consulting / Hosting http://www.smithmicro.com (formerly Pacific Coast Software)------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>If I use the field name quote1 in the found items, it will only pull in >the specific field I call, correct? So, in other words, it won't randomly >pull in a quote from any of the other fields (quote2, quote3, quote4). Can I >not accomplish what I am trying to accomplish by grouping fields?Searching for the data and displaying it are two separate things. I think your searching is OK. There isn't a magic way to display just the field that contained the match for your search. However, there are a few ways of doing it:[founditems] [quote1][quote2][quote3]... [/founditems][founditems] [showif [url][quote1][/url]^[url][search_data][/url]][quote1][/showif] [showif [url][quote2][/url]^[url][search_data][/url]][quote2][/showif] [showif [url][quote3][/url]^[url][search_data][/url]][quote3][/showif]... [/founditems]P.S. I did notice that your [search] in the original message was missing a GROUP1data=[search_data] parameter.John.--------------------------------- John A. Hill Smith Micro Software Internet Solutions Division eCommerce / Consulting / Hosting http://www.smithmicro.com (formerly Pacific Coast Software)------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
John Hill
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Using WebMerchant Only? (1998)
Can WebDNA do this? (2000)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
I'm tired of all this! (2000)
OT: zipcodes (2002)
WebCat/PDF Integration Time Est (2000)
RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997)
search results not sorted with 'cl' (1998)
Username for Admin Group (1997)
SOP for WebDNA talk - MSNBot Crashing (2004)
Follow-Up to: Removing [showif] makes a big difference in speed (1997)
WebCatalog dying in NT (1998)
hiding return characters (2000)
Switch Case Context (2004)
price carry over (1997)
Bug alert! (1997)
SEARCHES (2000)
Major Security Hole IIS NT (1998)
Customer login feature (2004)
Searching multiple Databases (1997)