Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 28621
interpreted = N
texte = Yup I agree, hopefully the barnesandnobles and other monied big boys willclear up the legal hassles so that we will know where we stand.Robert MinorDirector of Internet Services------------------------------------------------------------Cybermill Communicationshttp://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development andhosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.> From: jpeacock@univpress.com> Reply-To:
(WebCatalog Talk)> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:05:32> To: (WebCatalog Talk)> Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents> > Ah, that is the rub; almost all innovation is obvious after the fact. If we> can> prove that someone was talking about doing this sort of thing in WebCat (or> some> other package) before the patent was filed, or that someone had actually done> it> before Amazon began using it, then it was not an innovation worthy of patent> protection. If all of the evidence is that people were talking about doing a> shopping cart like Amazon's, they have a legitimate claim to primacy in this> narrow sense.> > I am not saying that the patent should be upheld, just that people who think> it> is merely using cookies to recognize previous visitors are not reading the> actual patent. I think, if software patents should be allowed at all, they> should be for a greatly reduced time period. The old type patent required> time> to build the hardware; software is much easier to get working right away. How> about 2 years for software patents? 20 years Internet time is about 2 years> real time, right?-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Yup I agree, hopefully the barnesandnobles and other monied big boys willclear up the legal hassles so that we will know where we stand.Robert MinorDirector of Internet Services------------------------------------------------------------Cybermill Communicationshttp://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development andhosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.> From: jpeacock@univpress.com> Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk)> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:05:32> To: (WebCatalog Talk)> Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents> > Ah, that is the rub; almost all innovation is obvious after the fact. If we> can> prove that someone was talking about doing this sort of thing in WebCat (or> some> other package) before the patent was filed, or that someone had actually done> it> before Amazon began using it, then it was not an innovation worthy of patent> protection. If all of the evidence is that people were talking about doing a> shopping cart like Amazon's, they have a legitimate claim to primacy in this> narrow sense.> > I am not saying that the patent should be upheld, just that people who think> it> is merely using cookies to recognize previous visitors are not reading the> actual patent. I think, if software patents should be allowed at all, they> should be for a greatly reduced time period. The old type patent required> time> to build the hardware; software is much easier to get working right away. How> about 2 years for software patents? 20 years Internet time is about 2 years> real time, right?-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Bob Minor
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
customizing the color of user's pages (1997)
READFILE command? (1998)
OT Spell Check (2003)
[WebDNA] DNA suffix (2008)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
WebCat vs. ASP (1999)
Forcing a NEWCART (1997)
Search Context Strips URL chrs.? (1999)
Alternating colors (1997)
posts (1998)
Am I going senile? (Price recalc based on quantity) (1997)
# of real domains on 1 web server (1997)
Exclamation point (1997)
strange IE 4.0 (1998)
[WebDNA] Dates (2009)
[WebDNA] shopping sites and the "old commerce tags" (2012)
unique ascending numbers (2003)
Alcatraz must have been nicer than this... (2000)
Signal Raised Error (Part II) (1997)
WebCatalog as a ListServ (1998)