Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 28621
interpreted = N
texte = Yup I agree, hopefully the barnesandnobles and other monied big boys will clear up the legal hassles so that we will know where we stand.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.> From: jpeacock@univpress.com > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:05:32 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents > > Ah, that is the rub; almost all innovation is obvious after the fact. If we > can > prove that someone was talking about doing this sort of thing in WebCat (or > some > other package) before the patent was filed, or that someone had actually done > it > before Amazon began using it, then it was not an innovation worthy of patent > protection. If all of the evidence is that people were talking about doing a > shopping cart like Amazon's, they have a legitimate claim to primacy in this > narrow sense. > > I am not saying that the patent should be upheld, just that people who think > it > is merely using cookies to recognize previous visitors are not reading the > actual patent. I think, if software patents should be allowed at all, they > should be for a greatly reduced time period. The old type patent required > time > to build the hardware; software is much easier to get working right away. How > about 2 years for software patents? 20 years Internet time is about 2 years > real time, right? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
  2. Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  3. Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (Bob Minor 2000)
  4. Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents (jpeacock@univpress.com 2000)
Yup I agree, hopefully the barnesandnobles and other monied big boys will clear up the legal hassles so that we will know where we stand.Robert Minor Director of Internet Services ------------------------------------------------------------ Cybermill Communications http://www.cybermill.com http://www.merchantmaker.comProviding Ecommerce and interactive website development and hosting services on Macintosh, Windows NT, Unix, and AS/400.> From: jpeacock@univpress.com > Reply-To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:05:32 > To: (WebCatalog Talk) > Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: OT: Amazon Patents > > Ah, that is the rub; almost all innovation is obvious after the fact. If we > can > prove that someone was talking about doing this sort of thing in WebCat (or > some > other package) before the patent was filed, or that someone had actually done > it > before Amazon began using it, then it was not an innovation worthy of patent > protection. If all of the evidence is that people were talking about doing a > shopping cart like Amazon's, they have a legitimate claim to primacy in this > narrow sense. > > I am not saying that the patent should be upheld, just that people who think > it > is merely using cookies to recognize previous visitors are not reading the > actual patent. I think, if software patents should be allowed at all, they > should be for a greatly reduced time period. The old type patent required > time > to build the hardware; software is much easier to get working right away. How > about 2 years for software patents? 20 years Internet time is about 2 years > real time, right? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Bob Minor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

customizing the color of user's pages (1997) READFILE command? (1998) OT Spell Check (2003) [WebDNA] DNA suffix (2008) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) WebCat vs. ASP (1999) Forcing a NEWCART (1997) Search Context Strips URL chrs.? (1999) Alternating colors (1997) posts (1998) Am I going senile? (Price recalc based on quantity) (1997) # of real domains on 1 web server (1997) Exclamation point (1997) strange IE 4.0 (1998) [WebDNA] Dates (2009) [WebDNA] shopping sites and the "old commerce tags" (2012) unique ascending numbers (2003) Alcatraz must have been nicer than this... (2000) Signal Raised Error (Part II) (1997) WebCatalog as a ListServ (1998)