Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 30361
interpreted = N
texte = I'll be out of town 'till after tax day, (It's really that bad ) so bear with me - there is no one but Door Prize (the cat) to handle your e-mail, and I really don't quite trust him at he moment.Thanx Have a good Day, (unless you have made other arrangements)Regards - Johnny>From: JoeDan@West21.com (Joseph D'Andrea) >Sender: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >Reply-to: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >To: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >At 8:51 AM 4/12/00, Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote: >>Where can we find a list of ALL the new features? > >Yeah... please check with the legal department... and tell us as many >of the new features as possible. > >I'm particularly interested in a feature that was proposed and agreed >to by someone at the then PCS where the number of records for each >found item in a summary search will be available. > >For example, right now if you do a search on a db and use a summary, >[numfound] equals the total number of unique values in that field. >But in order to find out how many records have that unique value you >have to do another search for each value. > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=[FIELD]] > [numfound] equal [FIELD]
> [/search] >[/founditems] >[/search] > >I'd love to be able to eliminate that inner search like this: > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [summfound] equal [FIELD]
>[/founditems] >[/search] > >___Joe___ > >_________________________________________________ >Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com >WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century > http://www.west21.com/ >_________________________________________________ > > >############################################################# >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > >Send administrative queries to > > > >----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- >Return-Path: >Received: from rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (rly-yc04.mail.aol.com >[172.18.149.36]) by air-yc02.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr >2000 12:15:18 >Received: from smithmicro.com (post.smithmicro.com [207.67.226.13]) >by rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:14:30 >X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.1 >List-Unsubscribe: >List-Archive: >>Message-ID: >Reply-To: >Sender: >To: >Precedence: list >X-Original-Message-Id: >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:11:14 >From: Joseph D'Andrea >Subject: Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? > Regards - Johnny ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  2. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  3. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  4. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  5. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  6. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (JSWilliams@aol.com 2000)
  7. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  8. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  9. Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Joseph D'Andrea 2000)
  10. Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
I'll be out of town 'till after tax day, (It's really that bad ) so bear with me - there is no one but Door Prize (the cat) to handle your e-mail, and I really don't quite trust him at he moment.Thanx Have a good Day, (unless you have made other arrangements)Regards - Johnny>From: JoeDan@West21.com (Joseph D'Andrea) >Sender: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >Reply-to: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >To: webcatalog-beta@talk.smithmicro.com >At 8:51 AM 4/12/00, Nicolas Verhaeghe wrote: >>Where can we find a list of ALL the new features? > >Yeah... please check with the legal department... and tell us as many >of the new features as possible. > >I'm particularly interested in a feature that was proposed and agreed >to by someone at the then PCS where the number of records for each >found item in a summary search will be available. > >For example, right now if you do a search on a db and use a summary, >[numfound] equals the total number of unique values in that field. >But in order to find out how many records have that unique value you >have to do another search for each value. > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=[FIELD]] > [numfound] equal [FIELD]
> [/search] >[/founditems] >[/search] > >I'd love to be able to eliminate that inner search like this: > >[search db=some.db&eqFIELDdata=_all_&asFIELDsort=1&FIELDsumm=t] >There are [numfound] unique values in the FIELD field
>[founditems] > [summfound] equal [FIELD]
>[/founditems] >[/search] > >___Joe___ > >_________________________________________________ >Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com >WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century > http://www.west21.com/ >_________________________________________________ > > >############################################################# >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > >Send administrative queries to > > > >----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- >Return-Path: >Received: from rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (rly-yc04.mail.aol.com >[172.18.149.36]) by air-yc02.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr >2000 12:15:18 >Received: from smithmicro.com (post.smithmicro.com [207.67.226.13]) >by rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:14:30 >X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 3.1 >List-Unsubscribe: >List-Archive: >>Message-ID: >Reply-To: >Sender: >To: >Precedence: list >X-Original-Message-Id: >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:11:14 >From: Joseph D'Andrea >Subject: Re: Webcatalog 4.0 - When will we be able to beta test it? > Regards - Johnny ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to JSWilliams@aol.com

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Encyption mail was Suggestions for Topics ... (1998) WebCat2b12 - New features for 1.6 users ... (1997) Date problems-more (1997) Lat & Long = Distance (2002) Comments in db? (1997) Quotation Marks in Database (1998) FREE Web Server Monitor FREE (1997) and vs or vs not (1998) Error after loading WebDNA (2004) WebMerchant 1.6 and https (1997) cart limit (2002) [TCPSend] and whois? (1999) Multiple prices (1997) Can't load tmpl files (1997) Number searching/formats (1998) Not really WebCat (1997) append=T problem (1998) RE: Nesting [ListFiles] (1998) WebDNA Feature Request (2006) Re:Up-date for Webcatalog 2.0 (1998)