Re: $flushcache causes crash

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 32599
interpreted = N
texte = >The new code has also modified the WebDNA tag parser significantly to >accommodate the new XML-style syntax. We have not seen any problems >related to this so far, but it seems that few people are using the >new syntax, so we have to rely on internal testing more than usual. >Even classic syntax may be affected, so beta testers should be alert >to any semantic differences that appear in existing code.What 'classic syntax' is going to break now? ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Beta less tested (was $flushcache causes crash) (Clement Ross 2000)
  2. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  3. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Robie Blair 2000)
  4. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Michael Winston 2000)
  5. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Kenneth Grome 2000)
  6. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  7. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  8. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Michael Winston 2000)
  9. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Grant Hulbert 2000)
  10. Re: $flushcache causes crash (Dale LaFountain 2000)
  11. Re: $flushcache causes crash (GHulbert@smithmicro.com 2000)
  12. $flushcache causes crash (Dale LaFountain 2000)
>The new code has also modified the WebDNA tag parser significantly to >accommodate the new XML-style syntax. We have not seen any problems >related to this so far, but it seems that few people are using the >new syntax, so we have to rely on internal testing more than usual. >Even classic syntax may be affected, so beta testers should be alert >to any semantic differences that appear in existing code.What 'classic syntax' is going to break now? ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Bug Report, maybe (1997) GuestBook example (1997) More to Expire (1998) RE: Automatic Forwarding using WebCat (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) &fieldsdir=ra truely random?? (2000) How to detect blank page (2006) .htm file tags not showing up (2000) Exclamation point (1997) Need help with emailer- 2 issues (1997) Re:Removing items from a cart is wonky... (1998) date (1999) WebTen and WebCat (1997) WebCat2b12 CGI Mac -- Problems propagating the cart through frames...still (1997) Generating Report Totals (1997) Display [price] in banner ad (1998) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) Protect (1997) PIXO with cometsite ... and/or other plugins (1998) Error Log.db --however (1997)