Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41117
interpreted = N
texte = On 7/1/02 5:55 PM, Stuart Tremain mashed the following keys :> Please do it !!!> -- > Stuart Tremain> idfk web developments - Australia> > On Tuesday, 2 July 2002, Scott Anderson
wrote:>> This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should probably be qualified>> by a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] then instead>> of a new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [FoundItems] context to>> display the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search attributes and>> aggregates could still be applied.>> >> Thanks for the suggestion.>> >> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak>> up'.I really like the idea, but I'm not sure about the implementation youdescribe. How would you differentiate the results?[founditems] [if [notfound]=t] [then]blah[/then] [else]blah[/else] [/if][/founditems]Something like that? Without something like the [notfond] in there, howwould you know which was which? -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On 7/1/02 5:55 PM, Stuart Tremain mashed the following keys :> Please do it !!!> -- > Stuart Tremain> idfk web developments - Australia> > On Tuesday, 2 July 2002, Scott Anderson wrote:>> This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should probably be qualified>> by a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] then instead>> of a new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [founditems] context to>> display the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search attributes and>> aggregates could still be applied.>> >> Thanks for the suggestion.>> >> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak>> up'.I really like the idea, but I'm not sure about the implementation youdescribe. How would you differentiate the results?[founditems] [if [notfound]=t] [then]blah[/then] [else]blah[/else] [/if][/founditems]Something like that? Without something like the [notfond] in there, howwould you know which was which? -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Aaron Lynch
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Not really WebCat (1997)
OT: AppleScript question (2003)
Calculating Shipping (1997)
Deleting Orders (1997)
ShoppingCart removal (2002)
Extended [ConvertChars] (1997)
Browser frames and URLs in the Location field (2004)
rotating thumbnails (1997)
RAM variables (1997)
Runtime version ... (2003)
WebMerchant and PCAuthorize (1998)
Close Databases Crash? (1998)
apache/linux8/WC (2002)
merchant accts. (1997)
Shopping problems with 2.1b3 acgi (1997)
international time (1997)
expired beta (1997)
Thanks Grant (1997)
Taxes rates based on item and State (1998)
WC Database Format (1997)