Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56988
interpreted = N
texte = If it's most important that the URI of the content frame not be revealed, frames would not be a good option as all a visitor would have to do is select to open a frame in a new window. May or may not be likely to happen depending on the experience of the visitor, but maintaining the anonymity of the content frame will be pretty low. There might be an issue with spiders and bots indexing the site as well I would imagine. Sorry, no suggestions off the top of my head for a better way of accomplishing this. GK At 06:53 PM 3/18/2004, you wrote: >I have noticed that in *some* browsers (or maybe only with some web >sites?) the URL in the browser's location field stays the same when the >visitor clicks a link or form button in a frame and when that action only >reloads that frame. > >It seems like the location field never changes in these sites, it always >displays the URL to the master frames page. Do *all* web sites (and all >browsers) behave like this? > >The reason I ask is because I want to build a site that gets its files >from two separate servers -- a non-webdna server for the master frameset >and the 'header' frame -- and a webdna-based server for the 'content' >frame which will need to change and be dynamic. > >I do not want the visitors to know where the 'content' frame is coming >from, that's my goal here. The best way that I can think of (at the >moment) is to use frames and rely on the Location field NOT changing when >only one of the frames is reloaded. > >Can I actually rely on using frames to achieve this goal? Or is there a >'better way' perhaps? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Joe D'Andrea 2004)
  2. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  3. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Glenn Busbin 2004)
  4. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  5. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Mark Derrick 2004)
  6. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Mark Derrick 2004)
  7. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Joe D'Andrea 2004)
  8. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  9. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  10. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  11. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  12. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  13. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  14. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( "Sal" 2004)
  15. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  16. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Tim Robinson 2004)
  17. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Frank Nordberg 2004)
  18. Re: Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Gary Krockover 2004)
  19. Browser frames and URLs in the Location field ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
If it's most important that the URI of the content frame not be revealed, frames would not be a good option as all a visitor would have to do is select to open a frame in a new window. May or may not be likely to happen depending on the experience of the visitor, but maintaining the anonymity of the content frame will be pretty low. There might be an issue with spiders and bots indexing the site as well I would imagine. Sorry, no suggestions off the top of my head for a better way of accomplishing this. GK At 06:53 PM 3/18/2004, you wrote: >I have noticed that in *some* browsers (or maybe only with some web >sites?) the URL in the browser's location field stays the same when the >visitor clicks a link or form button in a frame and when that action only >reloads that frame. > >It seems like the location field never changes in these sites, it always >displays the URL to the master frames page. Do *all* web sites (and all >browsers) behave like this? > >The reason I ask is because I want to build a site that gets its files >from two separate servers -- a non-webdna server for the master frameset >and the 'header' frame -- and a webdna-based server for the 'content' >frame which will need to change and be dynamic. > >I do not want the visitors to know where the 'content' frame is coming >from, that's my goal here. The best way that I can think of (at the >moment) is to use frames and rely on the Location field NOT changing when >only one of the frames is reloaded. > >Can I actually rely on using frames to achieve this goal? Or is there a >'better way' perhaps? ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Gary Krockover

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[convertchars] limits (1998) how to check for no value while using [URL] to prevent crashing? (1999) [LOOKUP] (1997) Artwork (1997) Empty Shopping Carts? (1998) Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Signal Raised Error (1997) Using Japanesse text with webcat. (1998) Nested tags count question (1997) X etc.... (1999) typo in docs (2000) pop up menu's (1998) OS X Problem... (2000) Converting spaces to + in results list (2000) Add message to Order (1997) [searchString] (1997) using showpage and showcart commands (1996) Include vs. lookup-opps (1998) WebCat for Unix?? (1997)