Re: Nested tags count question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11108
interpreted = N
texte = >> Had a page set up where the [search] [/search] was imbedded in the html >>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to >>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I >>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I >>created...hmmm. >> >>But my question is does an imbedded [search] [/search] take up more >>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering >>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future. >> >>Ken can you help me with this question > >Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of >a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels >of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with >the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all >the nested tags before it returns the html page. > >Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting >with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more >nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0 >and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's >why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0. > >I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with >the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but >I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know >enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a >faster web site. > >Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.comThanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it shows 11018K available to webcat.=============================================== Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com =============================================== Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  2. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  3. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  4. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  6. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  8. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  9. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  11. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  12. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  13. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  14. Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
>> Had a page set up where the [search] [/search] was imbedded in the html >>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to >>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I >>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I >>created...hmmm. >> >>But my question is does an imbedded [search] [/search] take up more >>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering >>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future. >> >>Ken can you help me with this question > >Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of >a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels >of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with >the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all >the nested tags before it returns the html page. > >Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting >with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more >nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0 >and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's >why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0. > >I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with >the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but >I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know >enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a >faster web site. > >Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.comThanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it shows 11018K available to webcat.=============================================== Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com =============================================== grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter)

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Generating Report Totals (1997) WebDNA Trouble... (1999) template includes encrypted template (1999) [replace] fails with too many formvariables? (2000) Version f1 status (1997) no [search] with NT (1997) list archives (2004) [date] tag not working on mac 4.0.1 (2000) Gantt style chart (2004) The USArea® Network web site ... (1997) Secure Server (1997) Sort & Shownext (1999) ErrorLog with Linux? (2000) Email Newsletters (2003) I'm new be kind (1997) 2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997) [WebDNA] Triggers issue, or sendmail? (2012) wc 2 pro users - sites, quotes wanted (1997) TIP: using [middle] to peel off page.html from [referrer] (2004) SiteEdit NewFile.html ? (1997)