Re: Nested tags count question
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11112
interpreted = N
texte = >>> Had a page set up where the [search] [/search] was imbedded in the html >>>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to >>>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I >>>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I >>>created...hmmm. >>> >>>But my question is does an imbedded [search] [/search] take up more >>>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering >>>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future. >>Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of >>a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels >>of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with >>the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all >>the nested tags before it returns the html page. >> >>Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting >>with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more >>nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0 >>and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's >>why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0. >> >>I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with >>the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but >>I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know >>enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a >>faster web site. >Thanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to >webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it >shows 11018K available to webcat. I hope I didn't mislead you, but I think it's more than a raw memory issue. In other words, allocating more memory won't make any difference ...Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>> Had a page set up where the
[search] [/search] was imbedded in the html >>>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to >>>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I >>>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I >>>created...hmmm. >>> >>>But my question is does an imbedded
[search] [/search] take up more >>>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering >>>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future. >>Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of >>a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels >>of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with >>the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all >>the nested tags before it returns the html page. >> >>Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting >>with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more >>nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0 >>and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's >>why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0. >> >>I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with >>the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but >>I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know >>enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a >>faster web site. >Thanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to >webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it >shows 11018K available to webcat. I hope I didn't mislead you, but I think it's more than a raw memory issue. In other words, allocating more memory won't make any difference ...Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Emailer Q (2002)
if then logic (2005)
Two options to consider (2008)
[Off] Netscape Display Problem (1998)
Windows 2.1b2 Append Bug? (1997)
[WebDNA] New Ownership for WebDNA! (2008)
Download capabilities (1997)
[WebDNA] Payeezy FirstData (2019)
WC Database Format (1997)
Secure Server basic question... (1997)
Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997)
[OT] Change permissions via FTP? (2002)
[WebDNA] [OT] DNS Services (2010)
TaxTotal Problem (1997)
NT vs Mac (1997)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
PDF on the fly - how to? (2005)
Suggestions (1998)
emailer (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)