Re: Nested tags count question
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11112
interpreted = N
texte = >>> Had a page set up where the [search] [/search] was imbedded in the html>>>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to>>>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I>>>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I>>>created...hmmm.>>>>>>But my question is does an imbedded [search] [/search] take up more>>>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering>>>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future.>>Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of>>a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels>>of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with>>the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all>>the nested tags before it returns the html page.>>>>Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting>>with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more>>nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0>>and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's>>why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0.>>>>I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with>>the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but>>I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know>>enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a>>faster web site.>Thanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to>webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it>shows 11018K available to webcat.I hope I didn't mislead you, but I think it's more than a raw memory issue.In other words, allocating more memory won't make any difference ...Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>> Had a page set up where the
[search] [/search] was imbedded in the html>>>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to>>>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I>>>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I>>>created...hmmm.>>>>>>But my question is does an imbedded
[search] [/search] take up more>>>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering>>>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future.>>Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of>>a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels>>of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with>>the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all>>the nested tags before it returns the html page.>>>>Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting>>with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more>>nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0>>and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's>>why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0.>>>>I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with>>the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but>>I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know>>enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a>>faster web site.>Thanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to>webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it>shows 11018K available to webcat.I hope I didn't mislead you, but I think it's more than a raw memory issue.In other words, allocating more memory won't make any difference ...Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
carriage returns in data (1997)
[WebDNA] Graphite Forum (2009)
how to deal with xml exported file (2007)
Appendfile memory usage (redux) (2003)
DB Line endings (2002)
(thx) automating a POST (2002)
Two options to consider (2008)
Secure server question (1997)
Question re: FlushDatabases (1997)
textA (1998)
[ignore this] Wierd display error.... (2004)
how do I delete 1 of 2 identical records? (2003)
SiteGuard Use Question (1997)
Loop into field (1998)
WebDNA for Dummies (was: WebDNA portability) (2007)
finding child records of child records of child records... with minimal code (2000)
find with exceptions (1997)
New (1998)
[OT] Xserve (2002)
restart needed???? (1997)