Re: Nested tags count question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11129
interpreted = N
texte = >>Grant, you mentioned that more memory helps with the number of simultaneous >>threads with the plugin ... How much more memory? Do you have any numbers >>or percentages we might use as guidelines to make sure we don't cheat >>WebCat out of any potential speed? > >WebSTAR has guidelines for plugins vs RAM. In general it's too complex for >me to come up with some kind of formula. I think you should make sure you >have about 12 bytes per record available for each threaded plugin >instance. Never mind, it's just too complex to predict. Just give >WebSTAR lots of RAM and watch its 'high-water' marker to see what's needed.If you're referring to that cute little green block in the WebSTAR status window, I don't see that anymore because I went back to 1.3.2 - after I ran into the problem of too few nested tags with the WebCat plugin. Do you have any ideas for checking the 'high-water' level with WebSTAR 1.3.2?Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  2. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  3. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  4. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  6. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  8. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  9. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  11. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  12. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  13. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  14. Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
>>Grant, you mentioned that more memory helps with the number of simultaneous >>threads with the plugin ... How much more memory? Do you have any numbers >>or percentages we might use as guidelines to make sure we don't cheat >>WebCat out of any potential speed? > >WebSTAR has guidelines for plugins vs RAM. In general it's too complex for >me to come up with some kind of formula. I think you should make sure you >have about 12 bytes per record available for each threaded plugin >instance. Never mind, it's just too complex to predict. Just give >WebSTAR lots of RAM and watch its 'high-water' marker to see what's needed.If you're referring to that cute little green block in the WebSTAR status window, I don't see that anymore because I went back to 1.3.2 - after I ran into the problem of too few nested tags with the WebCat plugin. Do you have any ideas for checking the 'high-water' level with WebSTAR 1.3.2?Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Banners (1997) Calculating multiple shipping... (1997) add vs. addlineitem (2004) PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) Limitations on fields? Server is crashing (1997) Date Help! (2003) [WebDNA] php/mySQL version of WebDNA Speed Test? (2009) RE: Credit card processing - UK (1997) WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) WebDNA & Suse Linux (2004) Protect (1997) DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997) Major bug report on rootbeer (1997) Force a search at the default.tmpl page? (1997) Re:Running 2 two WebCatalog.acgi's (1996) Initiating NewCart (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) ftp ng (1999) Separate SSL Server (1997)