Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 46771
interpreted = N
texte = On 1/9/03 3:15 AM, John Peacock wrote:> Your SQL database will have a formatted date output; use that. I've never > heard > of any database using milliseconds as a basis for its internal date > representation. You should be able to divide by 1000 (to get seconds since > the > epoch), divide by 60*60*24 to get to days, and then add the number of days > from > 0 -> Jan 1, 1970 to get to a WebCat date number. But I would really use the > formatted date output from the database instead.I don't have much of an option now because this is what I was given.... I'll try your method though.Thanks -- Jesse Williams-Proudman || CEO NineWire Digital Solutions || +1.888.873.6199 jesse@ninewire.com || http://ninewire.com Mac Web Hosting & Colocation || Mac Nationwide Dialup Xserve Colocation Special, $75 / Month http://www.ninewire.com------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Dan Strong 2003)
  2. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  3. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  4. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Dan Strong 2003)
  5. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (sally 2003)
  6. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (John Peacock 2003)
  7. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  8. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  9. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  10. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  11. Re: Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  12. Converting SQL Microtime to Date and Time (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
On 1/9/03 3:15 AM, John Peacock wrote:> Your SQL database will have a formatted date output; use that. I've never > heard > of any database using milliseconds as a basis for its internal date > representation. You should be able to divide by 1000 (to get seconds since > the > epoch), divide by 60*60*24 to get to days, and then add the number of days > from > 0 -> Jan 1, 1970 to get to a WebCat date number. But I would really use the > formatted date output from the database instead.I don't have much of an option now because this is what I was given.... I'll try your method though.Thanks -- Jesse Williams-Proudman || CEO NineWire Digital Solutions || +1.888.873.6199 jesse@ninewire.com || http://ninewire.com Mac Web Hosting & Colocation || Mac Nationwide Dialup Xserve Colocation Special, $75 / Month http://www.ninewire.com------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jesse Williams-Proudman

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Help!!!! (1999) Canada oh Canada (2004) Summary search -- speed (1997) lookup command (1999) Multiple Newcarts (1996) RE: Displaying Location (1997) French characters in variables (2001) Expiration of Carts (1997) ReturnRaw context (1997) ShowIf variables (1997) FYI: virus alert (1996) update on wn searching (1997) Nesting format tags (1997) [LOOKUP] (1997) auto adding SKUs w/DB helper (1998) Include a big block of text (1997) Exclamation point (1997) Opinion: [input] should be called [output] ... (1997) WebCat editing, SiteGuard WAS:SiteAssociative lookup style? (1997) Help! (2000)