Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48202
interpreted = N
texte = HiBut the stupid thing is, as I understand it, SM actually allow...www.isp.com/site1 www.isp.com/site2 www.isp.com/site3 www.isp.com/site...etc...so if someone wants to 'abuse' a cheap licence they can easily do so. From our point of view I think we have more sites with more than one domain pointing to them than not. One site has about 20 different actual domain names, not counting the www. and other sub domains. That would need an unlimited licence for itself.Paul On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 04:17 AM, Clement Ross wrote:> Yup, per sub-domain does not make sense. > > For each and every client we usually have: > > domain.com > www.domain.com > secure.domain.com > and sometimes store.domain.com > > All pointing to the save directory. > > It should be like when we register the domain name, the client pays > once for > domain.com but does not pay anything for www.domain.com. > > If you do it this way, you will obviously have some people that will > abuse > the license by doing something like that: client1.isp.com, > store.client.isp.com. So they wont have to pay any additional 50$ but i > think this would be a very small minority. > > Clem. > > Donovan wrote: >> >> Phillip Bonesteele wrote: >> [snip] >> >> Philip, >> Here is the thing I'm most frustrated with. The non-distinction >> between >> hosts (sub-domains) and domains. I understand that SM is trying to >> offer >> a cheaper entry point. I think this is a good idea. However, please >> consider the >> following; please allow a single license to include sub-domains. >> >> Hosts (sub-domains) have always been a feature that one has complete >> ownership over once >> they buy a domain. It is frustrating to know that if one owns: >> surfing.com that >> one will have to pay extra for creating: >> >> www.surfing.com >> dev.surfing.com >> secure.surfing.com >> >> I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per >> sub-domain system. >> Please reconsider adding allowing hosts. >> >> Sincerely, >> Donovan >> >> -- >> -Donovan Brooke >> -Administrator of IT / >> -Assc. Art Director >> -Creative Services >> -Epsen Hillmer Graphics >> >> -402.342.1169 X297 >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
  2. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
  3. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
  4. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  5. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
  6. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  8. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
  9. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  11. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
  12. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  13. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
  14. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  15. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  16. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
  17. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  19. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  20. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  21. Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
HiBut the stupid thing is, as I understand it, SM actually allow...www.isp.com/site1 www.isp.com/site2 www.isp.com/site3 www.isp.com/site...etc...so if someone wants to 'abuse' a cheap licence they can easily do so. From our point of view I think we have more sites with more than one domain pointing to them than not. One site has about 20 different actual domain names, not counting the www. and other sub domains. That would need an unlimited licence for itself.Paul On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 04:17 AM, Clement Ross wrote:> Yup, per sub-domain does not make sense. > > For each and every client we usually have: > > domain.com > www.domain.com > secure.domain.com > and sometimes store.domain.com > > All pointing to the save directory. > > It should be like when we register the domain name, the client pays > once for > domain.com but does not pay anything for www.domain.com. > > If you do it this way, you will obviously have some people that will > abuse > the license by doing something like that: client1.isp.com, > store.client.isp.com. So they wont have to pay any additional 50$ but i > think this would be a very small minority. > > Clem. > > Donovan wrote: >> >> Phillip Bonesteele wrote: >> [snip] >> >> Philip, >> Here is the thing I'm most frustrated with. The non-distinction >> between >> hosts (sub-domains) and domains. I understand that SM is trying to >> offer >> a cheaper entry point. I think this is a good idea. However, please >> consider the >> following; please allow a single license to include sub-domains. >> >> Hosts (sub-domains) have always been a feature that one has complete >> ownership over once >> they buy a domain. It is frustrating to know that if one owns: >> surfing.com that >> one will have to pay extra for creating: >> >> www.surfing.com >> dev.surfing.com >> secure.surfing.com >> >> I might be sold on a per domain system but I will not on a per >> sub-domain system. >> Please reconsider adding allowing hosts. >> >> Sincerely, >> Donovan >> >> -- >> -Donovan Brooke >> -Administrator of IT / >> -Assc. Art Director >> -Creative Services >> -Epsen Hillmer Graphics >> >> -402.342.1169 X297 >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Paul Willis

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[date format] w/in sendmail (1997) Date search - yes or no (1997) Just testing (2003) [format] problem (2001) Search results templates (1996) Another bug to squash (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) Extracting a Word (2000) Initiating NewCart (1997) case number with spaces. (2000) [WebDNA] Competitors! (2008) Separate SSL Server (1997) [showif] with ! (2000) multiple credit card merchant accounts/processors (1997) textarea inputs and returns (1999) [WebDNA] Ubuntu 14.04 & WebDNA (2017) Summing fields (1997) Sandboxes (2004) Searching using numbers (1998) Un[url]ize (1999) [OT] Form POSTing with LONG variable (2007)