Friendly , quick 'security' check, please

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 51873
interpreted = N
texte = My client is claiming that a site I built for him does not work. I am not above admitting that I make mistakes, but I have checked and checked and checked and it seems to be working fine for me. Can someone please take a look at this and tell me what they find: http://www.gfilinks.com Cleint had me build the form so that 2 conditions had to be met in order to sucessfully submit the form: 1) USER_CODE must be correct. Client controls (i.e. can change) the USER_CODE from the back-end admin, and they give it to their clients themselves). It all works fine for me. 2) I AGREE radio button must be checked. Unless both of these conditions are met, user is bounced back to index.html (the form), otherwise they are allowed to index2.html (where stuff gets written to a .db, etc., etc., Any outside perspective (criticism even) would be much appreciated...client is complaining of runtime errors, etc., none of which I am able to reproduce. TIA, -Dan ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  2. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Donovan 2003)
  3. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  4. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Donovan 2003)
  5. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  6. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  8. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  9. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Chris List Recipient 2003)
  10. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  11. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Donovan 2003)
  12. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  13. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  14. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Chris List Recipient 2003)
  15. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  16. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Aaron Lynch 2003)
  17. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  18. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Alain Russell 2003)
  19. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  20. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Jeff Logan 2003)
  21. Re: Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( Alain Russell 2003)
  22. Friendly , quick 'security' check, please ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
My client is claiming that a site I built for him does not work. I am not above admitting that I make mistakes, but I have checked and checked and checked and it seems to be working fine for me. Can someone please take a look at this and tell me what they find: http://www.gfilinks.com Cleint had me build the form so that 2 conditions had to be met in order to sucessfully submit the form: 1) USER_CODE must be correct. Client controls (i.e. can change) the USER_CODE from the back-end admin, and they give it to their clients themselves). It all works fine for me. 2) I AGREE radio button must be checked. Unless both of these conditions are met, user is bounced back to index.html (the form), otherwise they are allowed to index2.html (where stuff gets written to a .db, etc., etc., Any outside perspective (criticism even) would be much appreciated...client is complaining of runtime errors, etc., none of which I am able to reproduce. TIA, -Dan ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.StrongGraphicDesign.com (208) 319-0137 | Toll-free p/f 877-561-1656 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Dan Strong"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Backwards list behavior ... (1997) Execute Applescript (1997) Nesting format tags (1997) [OT] - simple JS question (2004) New commands in Final candidate (1997) [WebDNA] Calculate Cube root (2012) Writefile (2000) WebSite and *NO* Authentication Dialog Box!!? (1998) [Webcat 2]Next (1997) I've been framed by webcatalog! Does anyone know the way out? (2000) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) NT version (1997) Exclude by date - multiple (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) Sticky .inc file! (2008) [WriteFile] problems (1997) RE: WebCatalog2 for NT Beta Request (1997) Tiger / WebDNA (2005) formvariable funkyness (2000) Emailer file formats (1998)