Re: OT: javascript help
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53101
interpreted = N
texte = On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I'm using this to create my frameset with one main (top) frame and an > invisible or hidden bottom frame: > >
> > > What I'm wondering is ... does the bottom frame have to have a source > in order to be created properly? blank page - otherwise shows 404 i think... > I'm thinking that it does not, in > which case the browser will simply leave it empty -- which *should* > speed up the browser a bit. > > Does anyone know if removing the source > (src=resultsHidden.html?z=[z]) in the hidden frame will create any > problems in any browsers? > > I'm also wondering if the use of the number zero as the height of the > second frame will cause any problems in any browsers? it seems to me > that the only way to really make the second frame 'invisible' is to > set the height to zero -- but if this breaks any browsers then maybe > I should set it to "1". i have it like this written 3 - 4 years ago when there wasn't target in javascript yet:
it's kinda doing the same submitting stuff.... the top submits to the "bottom" frame.... nobody sees the bottom one.... > > Any comments or thoughts on these issues? > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Kenneth Grome wrote: > I'm using this to create my frameset with one main (top) frame and an > invisible or hidden bottom frame: > > > > > What I'm wondering is ... does the bottom frame have to have a source > in order to be created properly? blank page - otherwise shows 404 i think... > I'm thinking that it does not, in > which case the browser will simply leave it empty -- which *should* > speed up the browser a bit. > > Does anyone know if removing the source > (src=resultsHidden.html?z=[z]) in the hidden frame will create any > problems in any browsers? > > I'm also wondering if the use of the number zero as the height of the > second frame will cause any problems in any browsers? it seems to me > that the only way to really make the second frame 'invisible' is to > set the height to zero -- but if this breaks any browsers then maybe > I should set it to "1". i have it like this written 3 - 4 years ago when there wasn't target in javascript yet: it's kinda doing the same submitting stuff.... the top submits to the "bottom" frame.... nobody sees the bottom one.... > > Any comments or thoughts on these issues? > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Kalin Mintchev
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997)
Web Catalog 2 demo (1997)
Editing Users.db (1997)
no template caching (1997)
The Send Mail Button is the Best Troubleshooter (1998)
Apache processes (2003)
French characters in variables (2001)
send mail problem? (1997)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
Reminder... (2003)
Smith Micro - no competition (2000)
Practice runs ? (1997)
WebDNA Running Out of RAM? (2004)
WebCatalog 2.0.1 NT beta 1 released (1997)
[TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997)
Re[2]: Wierd problem with 3.08 WIN Version (2000)
mail list (1998)
Sense/Disallow HTML tags during $Append (1997)
How To question on setting up downloads (1997)