Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 53950
interpreted = N
texte = Phil,Check the archives. I have no desire in getting into an argument with=20you on this topic. The many posts by other users speak for themselves.The simple facts are that it is not simple to setup. I have sent emails=20=to support with the errors I was getting with no positive results.On Nov 11, 2003, at 2:41 PM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:>> I haven't seen any specific problems described with using WebDNA with=20=> SQL> Server via ODBC. We have not experienced any problems with any of the> customer sites we have done with such a configuration.>> Take a look at http://www.harman-multimedia.com>> Dual server network load balanced web farm running WebDNA, with a dual> server active/passive MS SQL Server cluster on the backend. It didn't=20=> take> anything special to make work, and it's been up for a couple of years=20=> now.>> Phil B.>> -----Original Message-----> From: CN Stuff> To: WebDNA Talk> Sent: 11/11/03 12:32 PM> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep>>> On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:36 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>>> Nitai @ ComputerOil wrote:>> [snip]>>>> I will even say, that PHP got so big, because they have a complete> SQL>>> (MySQL) integration done. This is mostly all what people care about.>>> Sad but>>> true.>>> Don=B9t get me wrong, but did you ever try to sell a very big =company a>>>> WebDNA>>> solution based on the flat files system. We have lost 4 pitches>>> because of>>> that. They all went with a system (less featured packed as ours) =with>>>> a SQL>>> database (because of their backends).>>>> Well, we do have the ability to hook into SQL backends...>> Unfortunately too many people have tried for YEARS to get WebDNA to> talk to an SQL database with no luck. It should not take 6+ months =just> to get that advertised functionality to work.>> Based on my personal experience WebDNA does in fact not talk to SQL> databases. And not just because I have not been able to get it to =work,> but based on how many have tried and failed and have ended up using a> different solution because of how difficult it is to get it to work.>> Dale-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Phil,Check the archives. I have no desire in getting into an argument with=20you on this topic. The many posts by other users speak for themselves.The simple facts are that it is not simple to setup. I have sent emails=20=to support with the errors I was getting with no positive results.On Nov 11, 2003, at 2:41 PM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:>> I haven't seen any specific problems described with using WebDNA with=20=> SQL> Server via ODBC. We have not experienced any problems with any of the> customer sites we have done with such a configuration.>> Take a look at http://www.harman-multimedia.com>> Dual server network load balanced web farm running WebDNA, with a dual> server active/passive MS SQL Server cluster on the backend. It didn't=20=> take> anything special to make work, and it's been up for a couple of years=20=> now.>> Phil B.>> -----Original Message-----> From: CN Stuff> To: WebDNA Talk> Sent: 11/11/03 12:32 PM> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep>>> On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:36 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>>> Nitai @ ComputerOil wrote:>> [snip]>>>> I will even say, that PHP got so big, because they have a complete> SQL>>> (MySQL) integration done. This is mostly all what people care about.>>> Sad but>>> true.>>> Don=B9t get me wrong, but did you ever try to sell a very big =company a>>>> WebDNA>>> solution based on the flat files system. We have lost 4 pitches>>> because of>>> that. They all went with a system (less featured packed as ours) =with>>>> a SQL>>> database (because of their backends).>>>> Well, we do have the ability to hook into SQL backends...>> Unfortunately too many people have tried for YEARS to get WebDNA to> talk to an SQL database with no luck. It should not take 6+ months =just> to get that advertised functionality to work.>> Based on my personal experience WebDNA does in fact not talk to SQL> databases. And not just because I have not been able to get it to =work,> but based on how many have tried and failed and have ended up using a> different solution because of how difficult it is to get it to work.>> Dale-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ CN Stuff

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep

2003

Top Articles:

Related Readings: