Re: Another Search Question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 55071
interpreted = N
texte = If are the same in grdatarq=0 and eqdata=[blank] it won't work of course, you're searching on the same field twice. You'll need to use Tim's suggestion below instead. (a reminder in case you've been overworked lately :) GK At 09:00 AM 12/21/2003, you wrote: >Tim Robinson wrote: >>Assuming it's the same field name: >>[search db=db.db[!] >>[/!]&group1field=[!] >>[/!]&group2field=[!] >>[/!]&grgroup1data=0[!] >>[/!]&eqgroup2data=[blank]] >>Regards, >>Tim > >Hi Tim, thanks. I must have been burnt out last night. > >I assumed that I would find unqaulified records with >leaving the "rq" off and that wasn't right since my search >perams are limited to only these two peramiters. > >I will just use: >[search >db=db.db&grdatarq=0&eqdata=[blank]&desort=1&type=num] > >Donovan ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Another Search Question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  2. Re: Another Search Question ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  3. Re: Another Search Question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  4. Re: Another Search Question ( Tim Robinson 2003)
  5. Another Search Question ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: Another search question please... (PCS Technical Support 1998)
If are the same in grdatarq=0 and eqdata=[blank] it won't work of course, you're searching on the same field twice. You'll need to use Tim's suggestion below instead. (a reminder in case you've been overworked lately :) GK At 09:00 AM 12/21/2003, you wrote: >Tim Robinson wrote: >>Assuming it's the same field name: >>[search db=db.db[!] >>[/!]&group1field=[!] >>[/!]&group2field=[!] >>[/!]&grgroup1data=0[!] >>[/!]&eqgroup2data=[blank]] >>Regards, >>Tim > >Hi Tim, thanks. I must have been burnt out last night. > >I assumed that I would find unqaulified records with >leaving the "rq" off and that wasn't right since my search >perams are limited to only these two peramiters. > >I will just use: >[search >db=db.db&grdatarq=0&eqdata=[blank]&desort=1&type=num] > >Donovan ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Gary Krockover

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Why doesn't this returnraw redirect to the new page? (2009) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) auction site (2000) email code (1998) Custom WebCat Prefs ... (1997) New commands in Final candidate (1997) More on the email templates (1997) [ModDate] & [ModTime] ? (1997) setting cookies for another domain? (2002) [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (2009) Questions on Mac WC 3.0.5b13 (2000) Am I being really stupid? (2003) RAM variables (1997) simple answer? [hideif] (1997) Physical Security for WebCatalog Directories (1997) SiteEdit NewFile.html ? (1997) ConvertChars request (1999) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) Add a field to the error log? (1997)