Re: WebDNA dying or ... ?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2005


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 62460
interpreted = N
texte = There are no plans to drop support for WebDNA. In fact, work continues = on the next WebDNA release. -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Frank Nordberg Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:44 AM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? Kenneth Grome wrote: >=20 > Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact = that=20 > all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software = would=20 > eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's = at=20 > the end of its life with no future development is always a losing=20 > proposition ... :( Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what=20 Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow=20 somebody else to take over support and development. If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one = huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even=20 for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and=20 useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the=20 competitors. Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to = Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Patrick McCormick 2005)
  2. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Jim Lanford 2005)
  3. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Gary Krockover 2005)
  4. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Dennis J. Bonsall, Jr." 2005)
  5. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Palle B. Nielsen (PowerPalle)" 2005)
  6. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( dean_smith 2005)
  7. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Gary Krockover 2005)
  8. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( devaulw@onebox.com 2005)
  9. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( nitai@computeroil.com 2005)
  10. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Jesse Proudman 2005)
  11. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Scott Anderson" 2005)
  12. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Palle B. Nielsen (PowerPalle)" 2005)
  13. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( nitai@computeroil.com 2005)
  14. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Scott Anderson" 2005)
  15. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Dan Strong" 2005)
  16. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Gary Krockover 2005)
  17. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Frank Nordberg 2005)
  18. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Kenneth Grome 2005)
  19. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "Dan Strong" 2005)
  20. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( nitai@computeroil.com 2005)
  21. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "paul" 2005)
  22. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( nitai@computeroil.com 2005)
  23. Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? ( "paul" 2005)
  24. WebDNA dying or ... ? ( Kenneth Grome 2005)
There are no plans to drop support for WebDNA. In fact, work continues = on the next WebDNA release. -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Frank Nordberg Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:44 AM To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Re: WebDNA dying or ... ? Kenneth Grome wrote: >=20 > Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact = that=20 > all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software = would=20 > eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's = at=20 > the end of its life with no future development is always a losing=20 > proposition ... :( Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what=20 Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow=20 somebody else to take over support and development. If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one = huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even=20 for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and=20 useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the=20 competitors. Frank Nordberg http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to = Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Scott Anderson"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Problem (1997) Press Release hit the NewsWire!!! (1997) WebMerchant Error (1998) Unix DB Permission Error (2002) OT- AS/400 and Macs (2003) Protect vs Authenicate (1997) Safari browser and WebDNA set-cookies (2003) Pirated WebCat? NOT... (2003) [searchString] (1997) b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997) Updating Prices in Online Database (1999) [WebDNA] Forum using Webdna (2009) WebCat2 - [include] tags (1997) WebDNA on Intel Mac (2006) Cookie set browser session. (1998) [OT] Test - THE ANSWER (2003) Update: Pay by Mail (CC, Check, Money Order) (2001) [Webcat 2]Next (1997) dont want to use credit card authorisation yet (2000) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)