Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66249
interpreted = N
texte = Adam O'Connor wrote: > Has anyone noticed any performance issues with webcat's XML/XSL features? > > We are going to be replacing our detail pages with static pages. Our > details pages are taking up too many resources due to embedded searches > and misc db connections. etc. Therefore we are going to change our > methodology and use static pages for our details page. Because of this > we are wondering which would be fastest and most dependable, static html > files or xml files parsed and displayed by webcat. > > I would like to use xml, but I don't want to be back where we started, > having performance issues due to webcat having to parse an xml file > everytime a details page is displayed. However, the xml will be a small > file. > So is parsing an xml file about the same as doing an [include file], > from a resource perspective, or is it more resource intense? > > Any comments? Adam, you must have a lot of products, or a slow machine to have performance issues. And, if you do have a lot of products, doing static html pages for the details seems mind boggling. I would go over the code and see if it can be written more lean and mean so to speak. Donovan Oh, I've only done shipping API's with xml but they work quickly and seem dependable so far. -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE EUCA Design Center <- Web Development (specializing in eCommerce),-> <- Custom Paint, Labels, and Specialty Signage. -> <- Home and Business Embellishment/Fabrication, -> <- Glass Blowing, and Art Glass -> PH/FAX:> 1 (608) 835-2476 Web:> http://www.egg.bz | http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  2. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from ( Kenneth Grome 2006)
  3. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  4. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2006)
  5. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  6. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html - Anyone from ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  7. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Kenneth Grome 2006)
  8. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  9. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Kenneth Grome 2006)
  10. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  11. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  12. Re: Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  13. Webcat XML/XSLT Performance vs. static Html ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
Adam O'Connor wrote: > Has anyone noticed any performance issues with webcat's XML/XSL features? > > We are going to be replacing our detail pages with static pages. Our > details pages are taking up too many resources due to embedded searches > and misc db connections. etc. Therefore we are going to change our > methodology and use static pages for our details page. Because of this > we are wondering which would be fastest and most dependable, static html > files or xml files parsed and displayed by webcat. > > I would like to use xml, but I don't want to be back where we started, > having performance issues due to webcat having to parse an xml file > everytime a details page is displayed. However, the xml will be a small > file. > So is parsing an xml file about the same as doing an [include file], > from a resource perspective, or is it more resource intense? > > Any comments? Adam, you must have a lot of products, or a slow machine to have performance issues. And, if you do have a lot of products, doing static html pages for the details seems mind boggling. I would go over the code and see if it can be written more lean and mean so to speak. Donovan Oh, I've only done shipping API's with xml but they work quickly and seem dependable so far. -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE EUCA Design Center <- Web Development (specializing in eCommerce),-> <- Custom Paint, Labels, and Specialty Signage. -> <- Home and Business Embellishment/Fabrication, -> <- Glass Blowing, and Art Glass -> PH/FAX:> 1 (608) 835-2476 Web:> http://www.egg.bz | http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

emailer w/F2 (1997) Logging purchases (1997) Can't find templaes (1997) question: writing files textb in webmerch (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) math and european notation (1998) TCP Connect for a newbie (2002) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) RE: Missing contexts on NT (1997) PCS Customer submissions ? (1997) emailer (1997) How big can WebCat go? (1999) Replace context problem ... (1997) I forgot (1998) Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) [if] and [showif] - A solution (2002) Last Day of the Month (2005) ReturnRaw, download link for mov (2007) [WebDNA] Webdna and Static pages (2018) virtual virtual hosted store.... (1998)