Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2006
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 66833
interpreted = N
texte = Run the following at the command line ignoring the comments after the # sign: rails app #this will make the application framework in a folder called app/cd app #get into that directoryscript/server # this will start the default server lighttpd if installed or webrickPoint your browser to localhost:3000 to see the default page for the server.Bill-----Original Message-----From: Pat McCormick
Sent: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:02:57 -0500To: "WebDNA Talk" Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)Dumb question:I can get all the software downloaded and installed, but nowhere in the tutorials and guides does it explain how to configure and start/ stop Lighttpd.Anyone have any hints?On Apr 7, 2006, at 10:48 PM, devaulw@onebox.com wrote:> No, Rails does not make programmers obsolete.>> From what I have seen (I've been playing with it in my increasingly > rare spare time), it increases the programmer's ability to change > the program without having to re-design everything. One can do more > with less planning.>> Here's an oversimplification:> Think of existing systems as being built on a very well defined set > of plans. Rails allows you to get to a basic application quickly > and then make changes to reach the final product without worrying > about having detailed plans at the outset, i.e. it is very flexible.>> Flexibility assumes you stick to the principle of having code not > repeated and keep data (model), business logic (controller) and > interface (view) as separate. You then change the one piece of > code that does the function and voila, the application is updated. > Rails does not make it impossible to not deviate from this, but it > seems to make it easier to stick to clean code (thanks in part to > Ruby).>> Rails also has lots of testing features built-in. I think Java > programmers might appreciate this more than most, but I'm starting > to see the value in some canned tests I can repeatedly use.>> Think of Rails as a platform that could raise the starting point > for a web project. Here's other examples, you can serve html, xml, > rss depending on what the browser can handle/has requested and this > requires little more than probing the accepts-header. You can > build validation into the model of the database. AJAX components > can be easily rolled in (updating forms and other nice effects). > Web applications start to look and feel more like desktop apps. > Think gmail, google maps and things like that.>> Bill>> -----Original Message-----> From: Gary Krockover > Sent: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:42:03 -0500> To: "WebDNA Talk" > Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)>> I'm curious - is something like Ruby on Rails making our jobs > obsolete? The days of coding pages upon pages of spaghetti code > seem to be going away to the plug-n-play modular designs that > something like RoR offers.>> On a related note, I'm still digging into Python. There are so > many modules and classes that can be added it's making my head > spin; and I mean that in a good way - it seems limitless to me at > this point. And to a previous message, yes, Python was used for > the Googlebot I later found out. It was also used for some NASA > project and several other notable projects.>> G.>> At 08:18 AM 4/7/2006, you wrote:>> Sounds interesting, I too will check this out. A while back I had >> some colleagues rant/rave about RoR.>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Run the following at the command line ignoring the comments after the # sign: rails app #this will make the application framework in a folder called app/cd app #get into that directoryscript/server # this will start the default server lighttpd if installed or webrickPoint your browser to localhost:3000 to see the default page for the server.Bill-----Original Message-----From: Pat McCormick Sent: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:02:57 -0500To: "WebDNA Talk" Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)Dumb question:I can get all the software downloaded and installed, but nowhere in the tutorials and guides does it explain how to configure and start/ stop Lighttpd.Anyone have any hints?On Apr 7, 2006, at 10:48 PM, devaulw@onebox.com wrote:> No, Rails does not make programmers obsolete.>> From what I have seen (I've been playing with it in my increasingly > rare spare time), it increases the programmer's ability to change > the program without having to re-design everything. One can do more > with less planning.>> Here's an oversimplification:> Think of existing systems as being built on a very well defined set > of plans. Rails allows you to get to a basic application quickly > and then make changes to reach the final product without worrying > about having detailed plans at the outset, i.e. it is very flexible.>> Flexibility assumes you stick to the principle of having code not > repeated and keep data (model), business logic (controller) and > interface (view) as separate. You then change the one piece of > code that does the function and voila, the application is updated. > Rails does not make it impossible to not deviate from this, but it > seems to make it easier to stick to clean code (thanks in part to > Ruby).>> Rails also has lots of testing features built-in. I think Java > programmers might appreciate this more than most, but I'm starting > to see the value in some canned tests I can repeatedly use.>> Think of Rails as a platform that could raise the starting point > for a web project. Here's other examples, you can serve html, xml, > rss depending on what the browser can handle/has requested and this > requires little more than probing the accepts-header. You can > build validation into the model of the database. AJAX components > can be easily rolled in (updating forms and other nice effects). > Web applications start to look and feel more like desktop apps. > Think gmail, google maps and things like that.>> Bill>> -----Original Message-----> From: Gary Krockover > Sent: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:42:03 -0500> To: "WebDNA Talk" > Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails (was Looping Search)>> I'm curious - is something like Ruby on Rails making our jobs > obsolete? The days of coding pages upon pages of Spaghetti code > seem to be going away to the plug-n-play modular designs that > something like RoR offers.>> On a related note, I'm still digging into Python. There are so > many modules and classes that can be added it's making my head > spin; and I mean that in a good way - it seems limitless to me at > this point. And to a previous message, yes, Python was used for > the Googlebot I later found out. It was also used for some NASA > project and several other notable projects.>> G.>> At 08:18 AM 4/7/2006, you wrote:>> Sounds interesting, I too will check this out. A while back I had >> some colleagues rant/rave about RoR.>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com>> Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/>-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
devaulw@onebox.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
DD/MM/YY reseting (1999)
Setting the Date (2000)
[convertChars] and HTML Tags (1997)
can WC render sites out? (1997)
Help name our technology! (1997)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Multiple Passwords (1997)
[WebDNA] Help with ReplaceFoundItems (2009)
[PROTECT] Problem (2003)
[regexp] will be renamed to [grep] in next release (2000)
ShowNext for method=POST (1997)
checkout.tpl (1999)
watch out for format_to_days on NT (1997)
How can I Add several Items into the cart at once? (1997)
[WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (2011)
[shownext max (1997)
Just Testing (1997)
ExclusiveLock (2000)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
Re:Help name our technology! (1997)