Re: Two options to consider

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 70182
interpreted = N
texte = Hi, I love WebDNA and have been very dishearten over the many years with the apparent lack of support for it from SM. This list and the folks on it (speakers and non-speakers alike) are the only ones I can trust to keep the dying flame of WebDNA alive (sadly losing battle). Count me in on option 1 as the first initiative and 2, if push comes to shove. Terry Nair -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of Diane Blackmore (Cohesion) Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 08:16 To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Two options to consider Hi Since everyone's experiencing so much fun with WebDNA at the moment, and we're all on the same page with that we love WebDNA but not SmithMicro for how they've treated us and their software product, what does everyone think about either of the following options; 1. Presenting SM with a collective option to sell WebDNA (or even better, make open source). If we all have sufficient interest, it may be possible to get them to loosen their grip on their IP, or enter into some sort of JV. "If you don't ask, you don't get". OR; 2. Assembling a class action law suit against SM for fraudulently mis-representing their intentions with WebDNA to mislead customers (us) into thinking that our development platform had a future, thereby promoting sales of a product that they knew to be defunct. Any takers on either option?? I'll volunteer to head up either effort if I can be assured of some support - If no-one is keen, my war would be in vain if I won it just to be the last one on the planet using it. Let me know people....... Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Two options to consider ( Terry Wilson 2008)
  2. Re: Two options to consider ( "Dan Strong" 2008)
  3. Re: Two options to consider ( "Planet DJ (Chris W.)" 2008)
  4. Re: Two options to consider ( Paul Willis 2008)
  5. Re: Two options to consider ( "Dan Strong" 2008)
  6. Re: Two options to consider ( "Dan Strong" 2008)
  7. Re: Two options to consider ( "Dan Strong" 2008)
  8. Re: Two options to consider ( Frank Nordberg 2008)
  9. Re: Two options to consider ( Stuart Tremain 2008)
  10. Re: Two options to consider ( Frank Nordberg 2008)
  11. Re: Two options to consider ( "Diane Blackmore (Cohesion)" 2008)
  12. Re: Two options to consider ( Steve Craig 2008)
  13. Re: Two options to consider ( Stuart Tremain 2008)
  14. Re: Two options to consider ( Dean Smith 2008)
  15. Re: Two options to consider ( Rob 2008)
  16. Re: Two options to consider ( Phil Herring 2008)
  17. Re: Two options to consider ( Claude Gelinas 2008)
  18. Re: Two options to consider ( "Will Starck" 2008)
  19. Re: Two options to consider ( "Will Starck" 2008)
  20. Re: Two options to consider ( "Dan Strong" 2008)
  21. Re: Two options to consider ( "Dan Strong" 2008)
  22. Re: Two options to consider ( "Terry Nair" 2008)
  23. Re: Two options to consider ( "Brian B. Burton" 2008)
  24. Re: Two options to consider ( Marc Thompson 2008)
  25. Re: Two options to consider ( Stuart Tremain 2008)
  26. Two options to consider ( "Diane Blackmore (Cohesion)" 2008)
Hi, I love WebDNA and have been very dishearten over the many years with the apparent lack of support for it from SM. This list and the folks on it (speakers and non-speakers alike) are the only ones I can trust to keep the dying flame of WebDNA alive (sadly losing battle). Count me in on option 1 as the first initiative and 2, if push comes to shove. Terry Nair -----Original Message----- From: WebDNA Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com] On Behalf Of Diane Blackmore (Cohesion) Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 08:16 To: WebDNA Talk Subject: Two options to consider Hi Since everyone's experiencing so much fun with WebDNA at the moment, and we're all on the same page with that we love WebDNA but not SmithMicro for how they've treated us and their software product, what does everyone think about either of the following options; 1. Presenting SM with a collective option to sell WebDNA (or even better, make open source). If we all have sufficient interest, it may be possible to get them to loosen their grip on their IP, or enter into some sort of JV. "If you don't ask, you don't get". OR; 2. Assembling a class action law suit against SM for fraudulently mis-representing their intentions with WebDNA to mislead customers (us) into thinking that our development platform had a future, thereby promoting sales of a product that they knew to be defunct. Any takers on either option?? I'll volunteer to head up either effort if I can be assured of some support - If no-one is keen, my war would be in vain if I won it just to be the last one on the planet using it. Let me know people....... Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ "Terry Nair"

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Search/sort in URL Was: GuestBook example (1997) Summing results of a nested search (2006) Sorting by date (1997) WebMerchant 1.6 and SHTML (1997) F*** you (1998) Multiply prices (1997) Reversed words (1997) Grep Question (2003) [WebDNA] WebDNA on LiveCD ... (2008) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) problem using ErrorMessages.db to redirect requests (2004) PCS Emailer's role ? (1997) Date search - yes or no (1997) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) WebTrends (2002) redirect with frames (1997) WebCat B13 Mac CGI -- Frames question (1997) Help name our technology! I found it (1997)