Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100408
interpreted = N
texte = well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  13. [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Toby Cox

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Forcing Paragraph Breaks on Results (1998) Emailer Problem (1999) [shownext max=?] armed (1997) Off Topic: MacOS X Server on iMac (2000) HELP WITH DATES (1997) Searching multiple Databases (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA Email Auth Functioning? (2014) [WebDNA] XML Help (2009) [isfile] ? (1997) [NT] ie 4.0 required (1997) New Command prefs ... (1997) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) Re2: AAgghh!! Help, please. SSL strikes again. (1997) Question (1997) Nesting format tags (1997) [math] are you there? (1999) WebCat 5 Intranet Question (2003) Loss in Form (1998) Price Not Appearing (2000) [Fwd: F3 database munching] (1997)