Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100408
interpreted = N
texte = well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  13. [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Toby Cox

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

How to get shownext to just shownext once (1997) WebCat2.0 acgi vs plugin (1997) Uploading Files and Descriptions W* (2000) method of payment (1997) WebObjects (1998) This message couldn't reach the list! (multi-column (1998) Problems With NT 4.0.1 Install (2000) RE:It just Does't add up!!! (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) [shownext] and descending order (1997) Re(7): Small Bug: ErrorLog.txt/[FORMVARIABLES]/[ORDERFILE] (1998) Thanks Grant (1997) OT: Typhoon (1998) system crashes, event log (1997) Cart Transfer from Un-Secure to Secure (2000) RE: Credit card processing - UK (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) Bug? I don't know... (1999) 2.0Beta Command Ref (can't find this instruction) (1997) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)