Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100408
interpreted = N
texte = well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  13. [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Toby Cox

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:Message Board (1998) file uploads with webcat...binary? (1998) F3 crashing server (1997) Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997) RE: WebCat and image maps (1997) multiple product databases (1997) type 2 errors with ssl server (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) rotating thumbnails (1997) [url] (1997) RE: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Ken's Data Manager (finally available I think ...) (2005) Help name our technology! (1997) [WebDNA] List Files question (2009) Change Subtotal (2000) [TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) Looking up two prices in Formulas.db (1997) New Plug-in and Type 11 errors (1997) [WebDNA] Limts? -and- Hot Merge (2009) WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997)