Re: [WebDNA] Not even sure what to ask for help on. . . :(
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 101639
interpreted = N
texte = David Bastedo wrote:> I stream through the same pipe and can handle up to 6mb a second -> which I have come close to, but not quite attained. The max I have hit> in the last week is 5.5.Pushing that close to the bandwidth limit is never a good idea. This may well be one cause of the problems but perhaps not the only one.---Rob wrote: > Which to me means that under normal conditions, low load, your lookups > are working fine, and everything functions normally. If it was a > problem in the coding, you would also see it in low load conditions as > well... yes/no?Not necessarily. An actual bug in the code would probably show up regardless but if it's a case of too complex a code for the server to handle, the scale of the problem would increase with the load.One "problem" with WebDNA is that it's a bit too useful sometimes. It's so tempting to keep adding another little script and yet another little script and...---Kenneth Grome wrote: > How many webdna hits are you getting per minute or second?That's a very important question although of course it also depends on the complexity of the code and the capacity of the server.A very rough guide:+ Less than 10 hits pr. minute: Something's really wrong if you have problems.+ 10-100 hits pr. minute: Should work fine unless the code is very complex and/or the server is old and slow.+ 100-500 hits pr. minute: Basic WebDNA functionality should work fine. Serious power required for advanced stuff.+ 500-1000 hits pr. minute: Time to seriously consider code optimisation and perhaps a faster server.+ More than 1000 hits pr. minute: You might want to consider a server cluster.---Ken's list of optimisation tips is a very good one (thanks Ken!) Here are a few more:+ Make sure you have enough *physical* RAM (virtual memory doesn't count) to run the software *and* cache all the templates and databases. This is by far the most important point. Nothing slows the server down more than reading from and writing to the harddisc.+ If you use temporary databases, keep them as simple as possible: e.g. just a a list of reference numbers pointing to a permanent database rather than all the data needed.+ Consider splitting large databases into smaller ones. But be careful: do this the wrong way and you end up increasing the load rather than reducing it.+ Consider storing large chunks of text as text files rather than in databases and use [Include] commands to fetch them. (Another method that may backfire so be careful.)Frank Nordberghttp://www.musicaviva.comhttp://stores.ebay.com/Nordbergs-Music-Store?refid=storehttp://www.abc-notation.comhttp://www.online-guitarist.comhttp://www.gitar-siden.comhttp://www.tablatvre.comhttp://www.mandolin-player.comhttp://www.blues-harmonica.comhttp://www.irish-banjo.comhttp://www.blues-banjo.comhttp://www.folk-banjo.comhttp://www.roarogfrank.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
David Bastedo wrote:> I stream through the same pipe and can handle up to 6mb a second -> which I have come close to, but not quite attained. The max I have hit> in the last week is 5.5.Pushing that close to the bandwidth limit is never a good idea. This may well be one cause of the problems but perhaps not the only one.---Rob wrote: > Which to me means that under normal conditions, low load, your lookups > are working fine, and everything functions normally. If it was a > problem in the coding, you would also see it in low load conditions as > well... yes/no?Not necessarily. An actual bug in the code would probably show up regardless but if it's a case of too complex a code for the server to handle, the scale of the problem would increase with the load.One "problem" with WebDNA is that it's a bit too useful sometimes. It's so tempting to keep adding another little script and yet another little script and...---Kenneth Grome wrote: > How many webdna hits are you getting per minute or second?That's a very important question although of course it also depends on the complexity of the code and the capacity of the server.A very rough guide:+ Less than 10 hits pr. minute: Something's really wrong if you have problems.+ 10-100 hits pr. minute: Should work fine unless the code is very complex and/or the server is old and slow.+ 100-500 hits pr. minute: Basic WebDNA functionality should work fine. Serious power required for advanced stuff.+ 500-1000 hits pr. minute: Time to seriously consider code optimisation and perhaps a faster server.+ More than 1000 hits pr. minute: You might want to consider a server cluster.---Ken's list of optimisation tips is a very good one (thanks Ken!) Here are a few more:+ Make sure you have enough *physical* RAM (virtual memory doesn't count) to run the software *and* cache all the templates and databases. This is by far the most important point. Nothing slows the server down more than reading from and writing to the harddisc.+ If you use temporary databases, keep them as simple as possible: e.g. just a a list of reference numbers pointing to a permanent database rather than all the data needed.+ Consider splitting large databases into smaller ones. But be careful: do this the wrong way and you end up increasing the load rather than reducing it.+ Consider storing large chunks of text as text files rather than in databases and use
[include] commands to fetch them. (Another method that may backfire so be careful.)Frank Nordberghttp://www.musicaviva.comhttp://stores.ebay.com/Nordbergs-Music-Store?refid=storehttp://www.abc-notation.comhttp://www.online-guitarist.comhttp://www.gitar-siden.comhttp://www.tablatvre.comhttp://www.mandolin-player.comhttp://www.blues-harmonica.comhttp://www.irish-banjo.comhttp://www.blues-banjo.comhttp://www.folk-banjo.comhttp://www.roarogfrank.com
Frank Nordberg
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[isfolder] and [filename] (1997)
Searching Multiple DBs (1997)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
Different Tax levels (1998)
What am I missing (1997)
Performance Settings (2000)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)
Re:Password Authentication - request example (1998)
Search context not finding recent entries (1998)
Signal Raised Error (1997)
Emailer (WebCat2) (1997)
[date] tag not working on mac 4.0.1 (2000)
Limit on nested [ShowIf]'s? (1997)
More on the email templates (1997)
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Card clearance, problems - solutions? (1997)
State DB & TIme Zones (2003)
X etc.... (1999)
5.0 Pricing (2003)
WebCatalog Technical Reference (1997)