Re: WC2.0 Memory Requirements
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10261
interpreted = N
texte = >Does anyone have any experience with the additional memory overhead when >splitting a database file into 2 or more with WC 2.0. ClubMac appears to >be running several large WC databases - does anyone know the memory >configuration of their server. Actually the RAM usage is less on WC2, because you're not forced to have all 27 fields in a database. There is some overhead involved for every field added to a database, so if you keep it down to the minimum necessary fields you will save a lot of RAM.Here's the RAM equation for a single database: (size of db file on disk) + (#records * #fields * 4)Having 2 separate db files open is no different than having 1 db file containing both databases. Except it's faster to search just the 1 database you're interested in.>I have also noticed some comment on the Webstar list about WC loading >another copy of the databases when a Webstar SSL transaction is invoked. This only applies to plugins. If you run WC2 as a CGI it's not an issue. And we're working on a plan to get plugins working the same way (probably not until the following release though).Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriorsPacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMasterSan Diego, CA 92128 |619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Does anyone have any experience with the additional memory overhead when >splitting a database file into 2 or more with WC 2.0. ClubMac appears to >be running several large WC databases - does anyone know the memory >configuration of their server. Actually the RAM usage is less on WC2, because you're not forced to have all 27 fields in a database. There is some overhead involved for every field added to a database, so if you keep it down to the minimum necessary fields you will save a lot of RAM.Here's the RAM equation for a single database: (size of db file on disk) + (#records * #fields * 4)Having 2 separate db files open is no different than having 1 db file containing both databases. Except it's faster to search just the 1 database you're interested in.>I have also noticed some comment on the Webstar list about WC loading >another copy of the databases when a Webstar SSL transaction is invoked. This only applies to plugins. If you run WC2 as a CGI it's not an issue. And we're working on a plan to get plugins working the same way (probably not until the following release though).Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriorsPacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMasterSan Diego, CA 92128 |619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com
Grant Hulbert
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)
Sorting by date (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
'does not contain' operator needed ... (1997)
[WebDNA] Bug reporting (2009)
Special characters in field names (1998)
[SearchString] usage (1997)
Banners (1997)
[WebDNA] 10.5 apache handler extension issue (2008)
Strange intermittent WebDNA problems Workaround (2008)
ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
A question on sub-categories (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
Re:Emailer and encryption (1997)
Problem (1997)
Show your support (2002)
Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)