Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102642
interpreted = N
texte = Now I understand what all you were saying before. So yes, WHY was the [PAGEKW] var showing a value other than the "wrong" value you were assigning before you fixed your mistake?! Not that you have time or desire, but can you recreate the behavior and show us in way that we could confirm on our own systems? Seems worth documenting, even if just for the interim in case it is a bug. -G On May 31, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Frank Nordberg wrote: > As I said, the [PAGEKW] variable *was* improperly set and once I > located and fixed the basic error, everything worked fine. So the > strange phenomena does not affect the regular site activity in any > way. It did however make debugging much harder. Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Marc Thompson 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Brian Fries 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Brian Fries 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Terry Wilson 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  16. [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
Now I understand what all you were saying before. So yes, WHY was the [PAGEKW] var showing a value other than the "wrong" value you were assigning before you fixed your mistake?! Not that you have time or desire, but can you recreate the behavior and show us in way that we could confirm on our own systems? Seems worth documenting, even if just for the interim in case it is a bug. -G On May 31, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Frank Nordberg wrote: > As I said, the [PAGEKW] variable *was* improperly set and once I > located and fixed the basic error, everything worked fine. So the > strange phenomena does not affect the regular site activity in any > way. It did however make debugging much harder. Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

The Send Mail Button is the Best Troubleshooter (1998) [OT] Am I an Idiot? (2004) Is QuidProQuo dead? (1998) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) WebCatalog 2.0 b 15 mac (1997) Format question (2001) Showif for mulitple variations (1997) Permissions / Restart WebDNA? (2005) Perl programmer needed (2002) Webstar V and Webcatalog (2001) won't serve .tpl -not permissions- can't process .tpl (2000) Format date.... (2003) Payments -> Bank Accounts (2005) Custom Shipping Charges (1997) WebDNA tables and commas (2004) NetForms for mail, sorry (1998) Help name our technology! I found it (1997) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997)