Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102652
interpreted = N
texte = Ken, you missed the earlier description of the problem wherein his variable literally contains the square-bracketed name of another variable, so yes the [interpret] was needed in this case. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> The interpret should not be required when that code is >>> inside a search context. >> >> It shouldn't? > > No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context > only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- > but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- > unless something prevents it of course ... > > There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] > interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so > this is probably not an issue for you anyways. > > It must be something you're doing in the code above that > search context that's preventing the tag from being > interpreted normally. > > >> The problem definitely went away when I added that >> interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at >> that point. > > I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of > things anyways ... :) > > Sincerely, > Ken Grome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Ken, you missed the earlier description of the problem wherein his variable literally contains the square-bracketed name of another variable, so yes the [interpret] was needed in this case. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> The interpret should not be required when that code is >>> inside a search context. >> >> It shouldn't? > > No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context > only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- > but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- > unless something prevents it of course ... > > There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] > interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so > this is probably not an issue for you anyways. > > It must be something you're doing in the code above that > search context that's preventing the tag from being > interpreted normally. > > >> The problem definitely went away when I added that >> interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at >> that point. > > I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of > things anyways ... :) > > Sincerely, > Ken Grome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
adding shipping cost (1998)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
Windows 2.1b2 Append Bug? (1997)
Three new problems, maybe a fourth (1997)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
WebCat cannot handle compatible search parameters? (1997)
item sorting (1997)
Authenticate (1998)
New Cart No. on same page (2003)
WebCatb15 Mac CGI -- [purchase] (1997)
[WebDNA] Advice required (2009)
Replace Statement (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
FM 4.1 and Webcat? (1998)
list items (1998)
Fw: Linux w/ apache (2000)
Error & Problem (1997)
A quickie question (1997)
RequiredFields template (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)