Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102652
interpreted = N
texte = Ken, you missed the earlier description of the problem wherein his variable literally contains the square-bracketed name of another variable, so yes the [interpret] was needed in this case. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> The interpret should not be required when that code is >>> inside a search context. >> >> It shouldn't? > > No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context > only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- > but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- > unless something prevents it of course ... > > There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] > interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so > this is probably not an issue for you anyways. > > It must be something you're doing in the code above that > search context that's preventing the tag from being > interpreted normally. > > >> The problem definitely went away when I added that >> interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at >> that point. > > I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of > things anyways ... :) > > Sincerely, > Ken Grome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Ken, you missed the earlier description of the problem wherein his variable literally contains the square-bracketed name of another variable, so yes the [interpret] was needed in this case. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> The interpret should not be required when that code is >>> inside a search context. >> >> It shouldn't? > > No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context > only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- > but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- > unless something prevents it of course ... > > There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] > interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so > this is probably not an issue for you anyways. > > It must be something you're doing in the code above that > search context that's preventing the tag from being > interpreted normally. > > >> The problem definitely went away when I added that >> interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at >> that point. > > I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of > things anyways ... :) > > Sincerely, > Ken Grome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
OS and/or browser problems? (2002)
[WebDNA] Serial numbers and pricing for WebDNA 7.0 (2011)
[no_cache]?! (2000)
Zipcodes (1998)
form crasehes server (1997)
Setting up shop (1997)
Download (1999)
can you use [middle] in a search? (2001)
The code, one more time. (2003)
Security Question (1997)
Any Unix/Linux version to come? (1999)
Formatting dates stored in db (2003)
ShowNext for method=POST (1997)
final on include (1997)
simple answer? [hideif] (1997)
help with autenticate (1998)
Shopping with Accounts (2003)
Email check problems -1 (1999)
raw=T is broken in [include] (1997)
users change an email address (2002)