Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 102652
interpreted = N
texte = Ken, you missed the earlier description of the problem wherein his variable literally contains the square-bracketed name of another variable, so yes the [interpret] was needed in this case. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> The interpret should not be required when that code is >>> inside a search context. >> >> It shouldn't? > > No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context > only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- > but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- > unless something prevents it of course ... > > There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] > interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so > this is probably not an issue for you anyways. > > It must be something you're doing in the code above that > search context that's preventing the tag from being > interpreted normally. > > >> The problem definitely went away when I added that >> interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at >> that point. > > I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of > things anyways ... :) > > Sincerely, > Ken Grome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Marc Thompson 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Brian Fries 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Brian Fries 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Terry Wilson 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Govinda 2009)
  16. [WebDNA] Variable mystery (Frank Nordberg 2009)
Ken, you missed the earlier description of the problem wherein his variable literally contains the square-bracketed name of another variable, so yes the [interpret] was needed in this case. Brian Fries BrainScan Software On Jun 3, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>> The interpret should not be required when that code is >>> inside a search context. >> >> It shouldn't? > > No of course not. Normally you need an interpret context > only when the tag or context would *not* be interpreted -- > but [variable] tags are always interpreted by default -- > unless something prevents it of course ... > > There is a preference settings that can affect [variable] > interpretation, but I don't think many people change, it so > this is probably not an issue for you anyways. > > It must be something you're doing in the code above that > search context that's preventing the tag from being > interpreted normally. > > >> The problem definitely went away when I added that >> interpet context and I didn't make any other changes at >> that point. > > I guess that's all that matters in the grand scheme of > things anyways ... :) > > Sincerely, > Ken Grome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ Brian Fries

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

OT: Let's see your workspace... (2005) email problem (1998) Dreamweaver plugin (2000) Thanks Grant (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) same products but different (1998) Robust WebDNA Job Manager / Accountant (2006) Date stamp and purging (1998) [WebDNA] Instructions for install on CentOS 5.7? (2011) ShowNext (1997) Public beta 2 for WebCatalog 4.0 is now available. (2000) [LookUp] (1999) RE: [WebDNA] New Site (2010) WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997) credit card authorization question (1997) Understanding texta (1997) searchable list archive (1997) b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997) debit cards and checksum (1998) Monthly Help File (1997)