Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103236
interpreted = N
texte = John Butler wrote:> >> I thought it was just>>>> Take off the URL=> > Bob, thanks for trying,.. but I did just try what you said, so tried this:> > [REDIRECT [thisurl]?ucn=[URL][somevar][/URL]&ntce=t]> > and got this in the URL location field (where it tries to redirect to) -> http://mydomaincom/html_docs/xxx.html?ucn=
> --> > Donovan, thanks to you too! > .trying to stay calm.. ;-) Hard to break the ancient habit to want to > be in the center of the herd..> > Now what important bits do you need?> Maybe this?> > Version=6.1> > PLATFORM=unix-Linux Intel RedHat> > anything more?> > -JohnAre you going by John now or Govinda? ;-)When you tested your redirect.. was it in the same context as your live setup?.. or did you test it separately? You said something about including it... which is what I meant by the important bits.Regarding redirect syntax, what we (the list) decided long agowas that you should use the [url][/url] tags when using the url=param. Johns/Govinda's syntax is what I've been using for years withoutproblems.I would suggest to you, John to run your pipe troubleshooting test *in the live context that the redirect exists in*.. 'include' and all... ifyou haven't already. This is what I suggested that you post to the listsince it is most likely where the problem exists.In general, I like your idea ofusing the WYSIWYG include tag to "hide" the classic syntax. However,you may be a maverick in doing this and the essence of beinga maverick assumes issues.Btw, yes, we have *officially* changed the reference to the WYSIWYGsyntax from "XML-style syntax" to "WYSIWYG syntax". This is because thatsyntax is of course not XML.. so we are naming it for what it wasdesigned for.Donovan-- Donovan BrookeWebDNA Software Corporationhttp://www.webdna.us**[Square Bracket Utopia]**
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Bob Minor 2009)
- [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
|
John Butler wrote:> >> I thought it was just>>>> Take off the URL=> > Bob, thanks for trying,.. but I did just try what you said, so tried this:> > [REDIRECT [thisurl]?ucn=[url][somevar][/URL]&ntce=t]> > and got this in the URL location field (where it tries to redirect to) -> http://mydomaincom/html_docs/xxx.html?ucn= > --> > Donovan, thanks to you too! > .trying to stay calm.. ;-) Hard to break the ancient habit to want to > be in the center of the herd..> > Now what important bits do you need?> Maybe this?> > Version=6.1> > PLATFORM=unix-Linux Intel RedHat> > anything more?> > -JohnAre you going by John now or Govinda? ;-)When you tested your redirect.. was it in the same context as your live setup?.. or did you test it separately? You said something about including it... which is what I meant by the important bits.Regarding redirect syntax, what we (the list) decided long agowas that you should use the [url][/url] tags when using the url=param. Johns/Govinda's syntax is what I've been using for years withoutproblems.I would suggest to you, John to run your pipe troubleshooting test *in the live context that the redirect exists in*.. 'include' and all... ifyou haven't already. This is what I suggested that you post to the listsince it is most likely where the problem exists.In general, I like your idea ofusing the WYSIWYG include tag to "hide" the classic syntax. However,you may be a maverick in doing this and the essence of beinga maverick assumes issues.Btw, yes, we have *officially* changed the reference to the WYSIWYGsyntax from "XML-style syntax" to "WYSIWYG syntax". This is because thatsyntax is of course not XML.. so we are naming it for what it wasdesigned for.Donovan-- Donovan BrookeWebDNA Software Corporationhttp://www.webdna.us**[Square Bracket Utopia]**
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
multipart part 2 (2004)
Emailer setup (1997)
Purchae error - Fixed to a degree (1997)
Sort Order on a page search (1997)
Help with number searching (1999)
Any 4.5 to 5.0 upgrade gotchas? [OT] (2003)
Searching multiple Databases (1997)
[sendmail] on NT? (1997)
[CART] (1997)
Banners (1997)
Appending current [date] to a database (1997)
WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997)
Weather (2003)
Clickable maps and WebCatalog? (1996)
AccountAuthorizer doesn't seem to work (1997)
Download URL & access on the fly ? (1997)
WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
HTML Editors (1997)