Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103236
interpreted = N
texte = John Butler wrote: > >> I thought it was just >> >> Take off the URL= > > Bob, thanks for trying,.. but I did just try what you said, so tried this: > > [REDIRECT [thisurl]?ucn=[URL][somevar][/URL]&ntce=t] > > and got this in the URL location field (where it tries to redirect to) - > http://mydomaincom/html_docs/xxx.html?ucn= > -- > > Donovan, thanks to you too! > .trying to stay calm.. ;-) Hard to break the ancient habit to want to > be in the center of the herd.. > > Now what important bits do you need? > Maybe this? > > Version=6.1 > > PLATFORM=unix-Linux Intel RedHat > > anything more? > > -John Are you going by John now or Govinda? ;-) When you tested your redirect.. was it in the same context as your live setup?.. or did you test it separately? You said something about including it... which is what I meant by the important bits. Regarding redirect syntax, what we (the list) decided long ago was that you should use the [url][/url] tags when using the url= param. Johns/Govinda's syntax is what I've been using for years without problems. I would suggest to you, John to run your pipe troubleshooting test *in the live context that the redirect exists in*.. 'include' and all... if you haven't already. This is what I suggested that you post to the list since it is most likely where the problem exists. In general, I like your idea of using the WYSIWYG include tag to "hide" the classic syntax. However, you may be a maverick in doing this and the essence of being a maverick assumes issues. Btw, yes, we have *officially* changed the reference to the WYSIWYG syntax from "XML-style syntax" to "WYSIWYG syntax". This is because that syntax is of course not XML.. so we are naming it for what it was designed for. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]** Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (Bob Minor 2009)
  18. [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (John Butler 2009)
John Butler wrote: > >> I thought it was just >> >> Take off the URL= > > Bob, thanks for trying,.. but I did just try what you said, so tried this: > > [REDIRECT [thisurl]?ucn=[url][somevar][/URL]&ntce=t] > > and got this in the URL location field (where it tries to redirect to) - > http://mydomaincom/html_docs/xxx.html?ucn= > -- > > Donovan, thanks to you too! > .trying to stay calm.. ;-) Hard to break the ancient habit to want to > be in the center of the herd.. > > Now what important bits do you need? > Maybe this? > > Version=6.1 > > PLATFORM=unix-Linux Intel RedHat > > anything more? > > -John Are you going by John now or Govinda? ;-) When you tested your redirect.. was it in the same context as your live setup?.. or did you test it separately? You said something about including it... which is what I meant by the important bits. Regarding redirect syntax, what we (the list) decided long ago was that you should use the [url][/url] tags when using the url= param. Johns/Govinda's syntax is what I've been using for years without problems. I would suggest to you, John to run your pipe troubleshooting test *in the live context that the redirect exists in*.. 'include' and all... if you haven't already. This is what I suggested that you post to the list since it is most likely where the problem exists. In general, I like your idea of using the WYSIWYG include tag to "hide" the classic syntax. However, you may be a maverick in doing this and the essence of being a maverick assumes issues. Btw, yes, we have *officially* changed the reference to the WYSIWYG syntax from "XML-style syntax" to "WYSIWYG syntax". This is because that syntax is of course not XML.. so we are naming it for what it was designed for. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]** Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997) multipart part 2 (2004) Emailer setup (1997) Purchae error - Fixed to a degree (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) Help with number searching (1999) Any 4.5 to 5.0 upgrade gotchas? [OT] (2003) Searching multiple Databases (1997) [sendmail] on NT? (1997) [CART] (1997) Banners (1997) Appending current [date] to a database (1997) WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997) Weather (2003) Clickable maps and WebCatalog? (1996) AccountAuthorizer doesn't seem to work (1997) Download URL & access on the fly ? (1997) WebCat2: Found Items syntax, etc. (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) HTML Editors (1997)