Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103476
interpreted = N
texte = > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3334139505_4921865 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Now that we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I a= m curious what the consensus is moving forward: Snow Leopard Server (OS X Server v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9? The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonder whether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control you= r coffee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/need iTools, which I have depended on [along with Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat 2x/Mac OS 7.x days. So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNA server, I would really appreciate some input on what are current best products and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question, here are a few current considerations:Timbuktu Pro or Apple Remote Desktop? Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel? All on the latest, maxed-out Mac Mini + RAID? Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks, -Chris On 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator > wrote: >> is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage of 64 bit...? >=20 > WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it runnin= g on > Snow Leopard. >=20 > The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the > WebDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitation= s of > the XML components. > The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affec= ted > by apache or the OS bit level. >=20 > (On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit= for > 64bit OS's.) >=20 >=20 --B_3334139505_4921865 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard Now t= hat we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I am curi= ous what the consensus is moving forward:  Snow Leopard Server (OS X Se= rver v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9?

The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonder wh= ether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control your c= offee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/need iTo= ols, which I have depended on [along with
Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat 2x/Ma= c OS 7.x days.

So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNA ser= ver, I would really appreciate some input on what are current best products = and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question, here are = a few current considerations:
Timbukt= u Pro or Apple Remote Desktop? Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel?= All on the latest, maxed-out Mac Mini + RAID?

Thoughts? Suggestions?

Thanks,
-Chris

On 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" <jazwebdna@gmail.com> wrote= :

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator = <bharrington@1choicerealty.com> wrote:
is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage o= f 64 bit...?

WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it running = on Snow Leopard.

The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the We= bDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitations of = the XML components.
The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affecte= d by apache or the OS bit level.

(On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit f= or 64bit OS's.)



--B_3334139505_4921865-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (frank@cwolfe.com 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (Govinda 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (frank@cwolfe.com 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (Govinda 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (frank@cwolfe.com 2011)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  7. [WebDNA] Snow Leopard and v7 (frank@cwolfe.com 2011)
  8. Re: [BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard Server install problems (Palle Bo Nielsen 2010)
  9. Re: [BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard Server install problems (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2010)
  10. [BULK] Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard Server install problems (Palle Bo Nielsen 2010)
  11. [WebDNA] Snow Leopard Server install problems (WebAdmin 2010)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (Govinda 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (Chris Wilkinson 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (JJ WebDNA 2009)
  17. [WebDNA] Snow Leopard (System Administrator 2009)
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3334139505_4921865 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Now that we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I a= m curious what the consensus is moving forward: Snow Leopard Server (OS X Server v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9? The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonder whether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control you= r coffee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/need iTools, which I have depended on [along with Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat 2x/Mac OS 7.x days. So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNA server, I would really appreciate some input on what are current best products and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question, here are a few current considerations:Timbuktu Pro or Apple Remote Desktop? Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel? All on the latest, maxed-out Mac Mini + RAID? Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks, -Chris On 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator > wrote: >> is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage of 64 bit...? >=20 > WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it runnin= g on > Snow Leopard. >=20 > The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the > WebDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitation= s of > the XML components. > The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affec= ted > by apache or the OS bit level. >=20 > (On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit= for > 64bit OS's.) >=20 >=20 --B_3334139505_4921865 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [WebDNA] Snow Leopard Now t= hat we can assume that WebDNA 6.2 is good-to-go with Apache 64bit, I am curi= ous what the consensus is moving forward:  Snow Leopard Server (OS X Se= rver v10.6) or Snow Leopard (Client) + iTools 9?

The new and improved Snow Leopard Server specs and admin makes me wonder wh= ether I need to continue to use iTools. While most of you can control your c= offee maker with the CL, I know that there are a few of us that use/need iTo= ols, which I have depended on [along with
Timbuktu Pro] since Webcat 2x/Ma= c OS 7.x days.

So, looking at building the most cost-effective, Mac, colocated, WebDNA ser= ver, I would really appreciate some input on what are current best products = and practices. Besides the Snow Leopard Server or Client question, here are = a few current considerations:
Timbukt= u Pro or Apple Remote Desktop? Itools, or even Virtualmin, Plesk, or Cpanel?= All on the latest, maxed-out Mac Mini + RAID?

Thoughts? Suggestions?

Thanks,
-Chris

On 8/25/09 6:08 PM, "JJ WebDNA" <jazwebdna@gmail.com> wrote= :

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, System Administrator = <bharrington@1choicerealty.com> wrote:
is webdna gonna be compatible and also take advantage o= f 64 bit...?

WebDNA 6.2 works with Apache 64bit.=A0 I foresee no problems with it running = on Snow Leopard.

The apache module is universal (32 and 64bit), and communicates with the We= bDNA engine.=A0 On Mac, the engine is 32bit due to compilation limitations of = the XML components.
The engine runs independently from apache and the module and is not affecte= d by apache or the OS bit level.

(On Linux, both the module and engine are 32bit for 32bit OS's and 64 bit f= or 64bit OS's.)



--B_3334139505_4921865-- Chris Wilkinson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Emailer (1997) File commands and Wild Cards ?? (1998) More Applescript (1997) mySQL or MS SQL (2000) [OT] ISP Windows program (2005) Date Time Oddness (1999) Looking for WebCat developer/contractor (2000) Three new problems, maybe a fourth (1997) japanese characters (1997) Replace with Producteditor.tpl (2000) For Sale: WebTen 3.x (2000) Where is f2? (1997) autocommit problem (1998) Status? (2000) Request for help on a new *automated* WebCatalog function ... (1998) RE: Cart Template (1997) RE: Languages (1997) FlushDatabase Suggestion (1998) Add to Cart & List of Products (1997) Price Change (2000)