Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103636
interpreted = N
texte = Chris Wilkinson wrote: > So, I just ran a localhost test on my new install - you can see it on the > list: http://www.euca.us/webdnatest/show_speed.html > > Mac mini, Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz, 4 GB RAM, PATRIOT 128GB SSD > OS X 10.6.1 (Server), Cicada 6.2 > > Total was 302 > > I was surprised to see such poor results on #5 & #9... So my question is, > what could affect the performance on the following tasks and how do I fix > it? > > Open a database (2 fields), append 500 records = 55 > > Writing 500 lines of text, each 100 bytes. = 70 > > Thanks, > -Chris Hi Chris, Personally, I don't think that is terrible. However, try running it a couple/few times to find your range/average... there may have been something going on during the time you hit the page which effected aspects of the test. In my tests, that speed test can vary as much as 30 tics. :-) I just tested an old G3 running 6.0 for fun and got a whopping 993. Then I overwrote it with a test on my new Bran new MacBook Pro.. 179. So, your MacMini score is not bad for a machine that costs so little I think. Though you may be able to improve it a bit by various means, I wouldn't be too worried about the score I guess. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]**
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Chris Wilkinson wrote: > So, I just ran a localhost test on my new install - you can see it on the > list: http://www.euca.us/webdnatest/show_speed.html > > Mac mini, Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz, 4 GB RAM, PATRIOT 128GB SSD > OS X 10.6.1 (Server), Cicada 6.2 > > Total was 302 > > I was surprised to see such poor results on #5 & #9... So my question is, > what could affect the performance on the following tasks and how do I fix > it? > > Open a database (2 fields), append 500 records = 55 > > Writing 500 lines of text, each 100 bytes. = 70 > > Thanks, > -Chris Hi Chris, Personally, I don't think that is terrible. However, try running it a couple/few times to find your range/average... there may have been something going on during the time you hit the page which effected aspects of the test. In my tests, that speed test can vary as much as 30 tics. :-) I just tested an old G3 running 6.0 for fun and got a whopping 993. Then I overwrote it with a test on my new Bran new MacBook Pro.. 179. So, your MacMini score is not bad for a machine that costs so little I think. Though you may be able to improve it a bit by various means, I wouldn't be too worried about the score I guess. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]**
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
When do we get to request new features? (1999)
Database of Tax Rates? (1997)
Smart caching problems with 2.1b3? (1997)
Looking up two prices in database? (1997)
Navigator 4.01 (1997)
RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997)
SET (1998)
Concealing WebCatalog in the URL (2000)
Sort Order on a page search (1997)
formatting a number (1999)
WebCatalog Hosting (1996)
Setting up shop (1997)
Suggestions (1998)
[WebDNA] Happy Friday (2016)
Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997)
Using Applescript to process WebCatalog functions (1998)
[WebDNA] two ideas for running a cluster of WebDNA servers (2019)
Does anyone have any ideas? (2007)
PCS Frames (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997)