Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103641
interpreted = N
texte = Chris Wilkinson wrote: [snip] > Automatically commit databases WAS unchecked... I ran the test several times > with nothing else running. All fresh installs, all new gear. > > Looking at all of the tests, my results don't look right in comparison with > other set-ups. For instance, a lesser Mini beat me by 100 ticks... WTF? Actually 77, which is 1.25 seconds. There is also a lesser mini behind you. > Anecdotally, with the solid state drive installed, this is by far the > fastest booting and application launching I have ever seen on a computer - > apps don't even bounce in the dock, they just go... > > I will do a more thorough test of the system, but I would like to compare > with another set-up to pinpoint the bottleneck. The Xbench test results site > is currently down, so Donovan, would you mind sharing the specs on your > MacBook Pro, perhaps an Xbench test? And, does .4Ghz more processor make > that big of a difference for WebDNA performance? Maybe I've got slow RAM? > > Any other configuration issues to consider? > > Thanks, > -Chris If you are really into finding that 1.2 second difference to the other mac mini posted on there.. you'd have to do some more tests of apples to apples... for example, you are running OSX Server, where the other appears to be running OSX client. Yes, not only apache, but other performance differences could be possible within an OS difference. It also appears you are running a 3rd Party drive.. which I guess could be a flag since tests #5 and #9 are writing to your HD.. What is the bus that you are using?.. maybe look into your SSD more closely??.. or at least run a speed test using the normal drives. Also, any RAID going on? What format is the file system?? etc etc.. (lots of possible variables) When all is said and done, like I said, I don't think a 302 is something to worry too much about for $750 in base hardware. ..sorry, no time for testing my own machine right now on Xbench. Maybe later. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]** Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (Chris Wilkinson 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (Chris Wilkinson 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  6. [WebDNA] Server Speed/optomization (Chris Wilkinson 2009)
Chris Wilkinson wrote: [snip] > Automatically commit databases WAS unchecked... I ran the test several times > with nothing else running. All fresh installs, all new gear. > > Looking at all of the tests, my results don't look right in comparison with > other set-ups. For instance, a lesser Mini beat me by 100 ticks... WTF? Actually 77, which is 1.25 seconds. There is also a lesser mini behind you. > Anecdotally, with the solid state drive installed, this is by far the > fastest booting and application launching I have ever seen on a computer - > apps don't even bounce in the dock, they just go... > > I will do a more thorough test of the system, but I would like to compare > with another set-up to pinpoint the bottleneck. The Xbench test results site > is currently down, so Donovan, would you mind sharing the specs on your > MacBook Pro, perhaps an Xbench test? And, does .4Ghz more processor make > that big of a difference for WebDNA performance? Maybe I've got slow RAM? > > Any other configuration issues to consider? > > Thanks, > -Chris If you are really into finding that 1.2 second difference to the other mac mini posted on there.. you'd have to do some more tests of apples to apples... for example, you are running OSX Server, where the other appears to be running OSX client. Yes, not only apache, but other performance differences could be possible within an OS difference. It also appears you are running a 3rd Party drive.. which I guess could be a flag since tests #5 and #9 are writing to your HD.. What is the bus that you are using?.. maybe look into your SSD more closely??.. or at least run a speed test using the normal drives. Also, any RAID going on? What format is the file system?? etc etc.. (lots of possible variables) When all is said and done, like I said, I don't think a 302 is something to worry too much about for $750 in base hardware. ..sorry, no time for testing my own machine right now on Xbench. Maybe later. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]** Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Security Issue (1997) Quick Replace Question (2003) [BULK] [WebDNA] Problem with bcc email (2017) [WebDNA] USPS shipping calculator (2012) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) 5.0 Pricing (2003) Bug alert! (1997) Replacing entry (1998) Re:WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) [WebDNA] preventing hackers from posting their own (altered) (2009) Tip: upgrading to WebCatalog 3.x, fields to watch for (1999) [Fwd: Rotating Banners ... (was LinkExchange)] (1997) RE: New WebCatalog Version !!! (1997) WebCatalog Work (2001) [DOS]/DOS query - ANOTHER SOLUTION (2003) Search returns all, not 20 (1997) [shownext] and descending order (1997) creative use of webcatalog (1998) problems with WebCat-Plugin (1997) Beta Documentation (1997)