Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103976
interpreted = N
texte = William DeVaul wrote: > One thing that would help WebDNA is a framework and a coding style. I > get that these are subjective, but I would not want to > maintain/improve WebDNA code that I did not write. > > A consistent place for putting things and for coding style would go a > long way towards getting wider acceptance. The Storebuilder generated > code might be the place to start. > > Bill Bill, A very alpha start in this direction could be: http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=617 I personally think this step (in the link above) could be a great asset to the community if it ever was adopted... in the form of either open source, or closed. In one of the welcoming threads, I post the beginnings of conventions that can be used to create a function library.. (I have to give credit to Brian Fries for this, because the ideas were adapted from some of his coding techniques). I suppose this forum category could be referred to as a place to post WebDNA classes. It would even be a nice place to discuss more conventions for these kinds of topics. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]** Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (William DeVaul 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (Brian Fries 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  6. [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng (Donovan Brooke 2009)
William DeVaul wrote: > One thing that would help WebDNA is a framework and a coding style. I > get that these are subjective, but I would not want to > maintain/improve WebDNA code that I did not write. > > A consistent place for putting things and for coding style would go a > long way towards getting wider acceptance. The Storebuilder generated > code might be the place to start. > > Bill Bill, A very alpha start in this direction could be: http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=617 I personally think this step (in the link above) could be a great asset to the community if it ever was adopted... in the form of either open source, or closed. In one of the welcoming threads, I post the beginnings of conventions that can be used to create a function library.. (I have to give credit to Brian Fries for this, because the ideas were adapted from some of his coding techniques). I suppose this forum category could be referred to as a place to post WebDNA classes. It would even be a nice place to discuss more conventions for these kinds of topics. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]** Donovan Brooke

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WriteFile] problems (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997) Emailer setup (1997) POP Mail Server Reseting (1998) Accessing Server Environment Variables (2003) Webcat/Webmerchant (1998) hmmm (2006) Dark Horse Comics success story (1997) Permission denied? (2004) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) formula??? (2000) user flush db (2002) RequiredFields template (1997) RE: WebCat name recognition (was MacFinder -- a new WebDNAweb site) (1998) Custom buttons using site builder (2005) emailer settings and control questions (1997) Req: Array Tags Explained, simple and clear (2004) Auto Unsubscribe (2000) Clickable maps and WebCatalog? (1996) WebCat with WebTen (1998)