Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104086
interpreted = N
texte = What about [loop start=3D1&end=3D700000&advance=3D1] [replace db=3Dl4.db]l4_index=3D[index][/replace] [/loop] - chris On Dec 2, 2009, at 19:15, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > Dan, >=20 > I understand where you are getting but it would be preferable to have = the IDs immediately. >=20 > I will let my questions live for 24 hours or so and then move to plan = B (in chunks) unless the better idea pops up from the list or my own = pillow tonight. >=20 > Palle >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 02/12/2009, at 22.06, Dan Strong wrote: >=20 >>> 1) Yes, but is not sequential. >>=20 >> Ok, next question: do the new, unique sequential IDs need to be in = there immediately? If not, perhaps add the new uniques as the .db is = otherwise being hit? >>=20 >> -Dan Strong >> http://www.DanStrong.com >>=20 >> Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >>> Dan, >>> 1) Yes, but is not sequential. >>> 2) Yes, same result - on it's knees. >>> 3) This is my next plan, but it would be nice to get it done in one = process. >>> Palle >>> On 02/12/2009, at 21.56, Dan Strong wrote: >>>> 1) Is there any other unique identifier in each record? >>>> 2) Have you tried [replacefounditems]? >>>> 3) Maybe "chunk it" to only do, say, 500 at a time? >>>>=20 >>>> -Dan Strong >>>> http://www.DanStrong.com >>>>=20 >>>> Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> I got a DB which has 11 fields and more that 700.000 lines of = data. >>>>> Now I need to add a new field and I need to populate this field = with an index from the number 1 to the most recent number which for = example is 700.000. >>>>> The number 1 is the first lines of data within this BD and the = 700.000 is the most recent added line of data. >>>>> If have done some test and sand-boxing and every time WebDNA goes = into it's knees. >>>>> I need some good advise from you all to figure out the best = solution. >>>>> I look forward to your suggestions. >>>>> **** this one is rough and breaks WebDNA **** >>>>> [search = db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound][foundIte= ms] >>>>> [replace db=3Dl4.db&eql4_skudata=3D[l4_sku]]l4_index=3D[index][/repl= ace] >>>>> [/foundItems][/search] >>>>> **** snip **** >>>>> Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>> the mailing list . >>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >>>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >>=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (chas conquest 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Marc Thompson 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  28. [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
What about [loop start=3D1&end=3D700000&advance=3D1] [replace db=3Dl4.db]l4_index=3D[index][/replace] [/loop] - chris On Dec 2, 2009, at 19:15, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > Dan, >=20 > I understand where you are getting but it would be preferable to have = the IDs immediately. >=20 > I will let my questions live for 24 hours or so and then move to plan = B (in chunks) unless the better idea pops up from the list or my own = pillow tonight. >=20 > Palle >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 02/12/2009, at 22.06, Dan Strong wrote: >=20 >>> 1) Yes, but is not sequential. >>=20 >> Ok, next question: do the new, unique sequential IDs need to be in = there immediately? If not, perhaps add the new uniques as the .db is = otherwise being hit? >>=20 >> -Dan Strong >> http://www.DanStrong.com >>=20 >> Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >>> Dan, >>> 1) Yes, but is not sequential. >>> 2) Yes, same result - on it's knees. >>> 3) This is my next plan, but it would be nice to get it done in one = process. >>> Palle >>> On 02/12/2009, at 21.56, Dan Strong wrote: >>>> 1) Is there any other unique identifier in each record? >>>> 2) Have you tried [replacefounditems]? >>>> 3) Maybe "chunk it" to only do, say, 500 at a time? >>>>=20 >>>> -Dan Strong >>>> http://www.DanStrong.com >>>>=20 >>>> Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> I got a DB which has 11 fields and more that 700.000 lines of = data. >>>>> Now I need to add a new field and I need to populate this field = with an index from the number 1 to the most recent number which for = example is 700.000. >>>>> The number 1 is the first lines of data within this BD and the = 700.000 is the most recent added line of data. >>>>> If have done some test and sand-boxing and every time WebDNA goes = into it's knees. >>>>> I need some good advise from you all to figure out the best = solution. >>>>> I look forward to your suggestions. >>>>> **** this one is rough and breaks WebDNA **** >>>>> [search = db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound][foundIte= ms] >>>>> [replace db=3Dl4.db&eql4_skudata=3D[l4_sku]]l4_index=3D[index][/repl= ace] >>>>> [/foundItems][/search] >>>>> **** snip **** >>>>> Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>>> the mailing list . >>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>>> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>>> the mailing list . >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>>> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >>>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >>> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >>> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >>=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 christophe.billiottet@webdna.us

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

More than one db with the same namn (was: WC2f3) (1997) [WriteFile] problems (1997) emailer setup (1997) Attn: Bug in GeneralStore example b15 (1997) Quotation Marks in Database (1998) Secure server question (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) Protecting webdelivery (1997) F2 to F3 rocky transition (1997) Retirement (2000) MasterCounter Weirdness (1997) [TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) Snake Bites (1997) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Mozilla/4. and Browser Info.txt (1997) OT : Best book for OSX (2002) Internet Explorer and caching (2000) Help name our technology! (1997)