Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104107
interpreted = N
texte = > I am not sure about it. You can unckeck the "Automatically commit > databases to disk after modification", use the "Activity Monitor" to > visualize the disk activity and prefer [replacefounditems] (without > the "[founditems]" context) which is much faster than [replace] > Something like > > [search db=l4.db&nel4_statusdata=dummy&asl4_serialsort=1] > [replacefounditems]l4_index=[index][/replacefounditems] > [/search] > > (http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=211) > > Please tell us what results you get. > > thanks! > - chris Chris, maybe it is as Ken said that every single [webdna_context]...[/ webdna_context] has [index] avail. inside it.. (and that would be great to know for certainty!).. but as it stands, [index] is not mentioned on the doc page you reference above. Maybe add it. (?) (for myself, even if I try something and it works, still I hesitate to throw it into client's code unless I know I am using officially supported [tags]/[contexts]. ------------ Govinda govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (chas conquest 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Marc Thompson 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  28. [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
> I am not sure about it. You can unckeck the "Automatically commit > databases to disk after modification", use the "Activity Monitor" to > visualize the disk activity and prefer [replacefounditems] (without > the "[founditems]" context) which is much faster than [replace] > Something like > > [search db=l4.db&nel4_statusdata=dummy&asl4_serialsort=1] > [replacefounditems]l4_index=[index][/replacefounditems] > [/search] > > (http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=211) > > Please tell us what results you get. > > thanks! > - chris Chris, maybe it is as Ken said that every single [webdna_context]...[/ webdna_context] has [index] avail. inside it.. (and that would be great to know for certainty!).. but as it stands, [index] is not mentioned on the doc page you reference above. Maybe add it. (?) (for myself, even if I try something and it works, still I hesitate to throw it into client's code unless I know I am using officially supported [tags]/[contexts]. ------------ Govinda govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

cart limit (2002) Date Bug (1998) Webcat/Webmerchant (1998) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) What's New Date (2002) emailer (1997) Anyone with a solution for this? (2001) unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Tech question about web dna actions (1998) Summing fields (1997) policies, slightly OT (2004) group searching problem (2002) [WebDNA] listfiles weirdness? (2018) NetSplat and WebCat2 (1997) [protect admin] (1997) [WebDNA] sharing a couple of WebDNA sites (2010) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) FileMaker Pro (1999) New Command prefs ... (1997)