Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104233
interpreted = N
texte = I concur Will.. totally. I've also had the same experience in a few =languages.I would add to your observation (that we often simply don't get the =luxury of knowing what all is happening.. down to the last detail)... - =that I am also very often amazed how much subjectivity factors in to =programming/code too. Maybe we could track every issue down to logic =details if we had enough time.. but since we don't have that much time, =we never get fully out of the subjective field. One clear day can =solve what a week of head banging could never shed light on.. and vice =versa.. when the mind is not clear then logic/code problems just won't =quit. And that good luck (born of clarity and connection to something =deeper).. creates the situation where we drive (as opposed to fight) =..and get the good result .. as if we even did know every last detail =of underlying logic in the source code(s)... or I should say it is more =like we get the benefit of knowing even without knowing. =20I'd rather be spontaneously right/"lucky" than know every bug and =possible issue in the source code.WIshing everyone to enjoy these days.:-)-GovindaOn Dec 20, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Will Starck wrote:> Who knows is usually a pretty good answer ;) ;) ;)> ...------------Govindagovinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Matthew Bohne 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Thierry Almy 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Patrick McCormick 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Govinda 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Patrick McCormick 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (america1007@aol.com 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (america1007@aol.com 2009)
- RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... ("Will Starck" 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... ("Terry Nair" 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
- Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Govinda 2009)
- [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
|
I concur Will.. totally. I've also had the same experience in a few =languages.I would add to your observation (that we often simply don't get the =luxury of knowing what all is happening.. down to the last detail)... - =that I am also very often amazed how much subjectivity factors in to =programming/code too. Maybe we could track every issue down to logic =details if we had enough time.. but since we don't have that much time, =we never get fully out of the subjective field. One clear day can =solve what a week of head banging could never shed light on.. and vice =versa.. when the mind is not clear then logic/code problems just won't =quit. And that good luck (born of clarity and connection to something =deeper).. creates the situation where we drive (as opposed to fight) =..and get the good result .. as if we even did know every last detail =of underlying logic in the source code(s)... or I should say it is more =like we get the benefit of knowing even without knowing. =20I'd rather be spontaneously right/"lucky" than know every bug and =possible issue in the source code.WIshing everyone to enjoy these days.:-)-GovindaOn Dec 20, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Will Starck wrote:> Who knows is usually a pretty good answer ;) ;) ;)> ...------------Govindagovinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
I give up!! (1997)
[showif] and equality (1998)
[WebDNA] File permissions on Windows? (2010)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
Merging databases (1997)
Tracking inbound links for discounts (1997)
Using [Include] Context (1999)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997)
Date or time comparisons have bugs ... (1998)
Sendmail Woes (2002)
Wanted: Broader string manipulation functions (1997)
Loop code problem (2000)
Emailer setup (1997)
OT: Collaborative Browsing (2000)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)
OK, here goes... (1997)
Public beta 4 of WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000)
Multiple SSL Keys (1998)