Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ...

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104233
interpreted = N
texte = I concur Will.. totally. I've also had the same experience in a few = languages. I would add to your observation (that we often simply don't get the = luxury of knowing what all is happening.. down to the last detail)... - = that I am also very often amazed how much subjectivity factors in to = programming/code too. Maybe we could track every issue down to logic = details if we had enough time.. but since we don't have that much time, = we never get fully out of the subjective field. One clear day can = solve what a week of head banging could never shed light on.. and vice = versa.. when the mind is not clear then logic/code problems just won't = quit. And that good luck (born of clarity and connection to something = deeper).. creates the situation where we drive (as opposed to fight) = ..and get the good result .. as if we even did know every last detail = of underlying logic in the source code(s)... or I should say it is more = like we get the benefit of knowing even without knowing. =20 I'd rather be spontaneously right/"lucky" than know every bug and = possible issue in the source code. WIshing everyone to enjoy these days. :-) -Govinda On Dec 20, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Will Starck wrote: > Who knows is usually a pretty good answer ;) ;) ;) > ... ------------ Govinda govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Matthew Bohne 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Thierry Almy 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Govinda 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Patrick McCormick 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (america1007@aol.com 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (america1007@aol.com 2009)
  14. RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... ("Will Starck" 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  18. RE: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... ("Terry Nair" 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Govinda 2009)
  21. [WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (Kenneth Grome 2009)
I concur Will.. totally. I've also had the same experience in a few = languages. I would add to your observation (that we often simply don't get the = luxury of knowing what all is happening.. down to the last detail)... - = that I am also very often amazed how much subjectivity factors in to = programming/code too. Maybe we could track every issue down to logic = details if we had enough time.. but since we don't have that much time, = we never get fully out of the subjective field. One clear day can = solve what a week of head banging could never shed light on.. and vice = versa.. when the mind is not clear then logic/code problems just won't = quit. And that good luck (born of clarity and connection to something = deeper).. creates the situation where we drive (as opposed to fight) = ..and get the good result .. as if we even did know every last detail = of underlying logic in the source code(s)... or I should say it is more = like we get the benefit of knowing even without knowing. =20 I'd rather be spontaneously right/"lucky" than know every bug and = possible issue in the source code. WIshing everyone to enjoy these days. :-) -Govinda On Dec 20, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Will Starck wrote: > Who knows is usually a pretty good answer ;) ;) ;) > ... ------------ Govinda govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

I give up!! (1997) [showif] and equality (1998) [WebDNA] File permissions on Windows? (2010) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Merging databases (1997) Tracking inbound links for discounts (1997) Using [Include] Context (1999) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - syntax to convert date (1997) Date or time comparisons have bugs ... (1998) Sendmail Woes (2002) Wanted: Broader string manipulation functions (1997) Loop code problem (2000) Emailer setup (1997) OT: Collaborative Browsing (2000) Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997) Resume Catalog ? (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) OK, here goes... (1997) Public beta 4 of WebCatalog 4.0 is now available (2000) Multiple SSL Keys (1998)