Re: WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10564
interpreted = N
texte = >From what I've been able to discern, there doesn't seem to be a way to use >a results template with searches initiated from a hyperlink or search form >... while using the same results template with searches initiated in the >[search] context of the results template itself. > >Is this correct, or am I being too confusing here?That's too confusing. But I think I know what you're saying, and it may be possible but really I think that where you're headed indicates a confusing design that may not be the cleanest way to set it up anyway.Perhaps you could use an [include] that holds the 'guts' of the search results page, such as the [foundItems] part, and then have 2 distinct templates: one for the URL-style search, and another for the embedded-style search, both of which use the [include] to hold the 'guts' that are in common between the two. How's that for obfuscating the answer?Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriors Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMaster San Diego, CA 92128 | 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com ------------------------------------ To leave this talk list send an email to macjordomo@smithmicro.com with BODY unsubscribe WebDNA-Talk ------------------------------------
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>From what I've been able to discern, there doesn't seem to be a way to use >a results template with searches initiated from a hyperlink or search form >... while using the same results template with searches initiated in the >
[search] context of the results template itself. > >Is this correct, or am I being too confusing here?That's too confusing. But I think I know what you're saying, and it may be possible but really I think that where you're headed indicates a confusing design that may not be the cleanest way to set it up anyway.Perhaps you could use an
[include] that holds the 'guts' of the search results page, such as the
[founditems] part, and then have 2 distinct templates: one for the URL-style search, and another for the embedded-style search, both of which use the
[include] to hold the 'guts' that are in common between the two. How's that for obfuscating the answer?Grant Hulbert, V.P. Engineering | Tools for WebWarriors Pacific Coast Software | WebCatalog, WebCommerce Solution 11770 Bernardo Plaza Court, #462 | SiteEdit, SiteCheck, PhotoMaster San Diego, CA 92128 | 619/675-1106 Fax: 619/675-0372 | http://www.smithmicro.com ------------------------------------ To leave this
Talk List send an email to macjordomo@smithmicro.com with BODY unsubscribe WebDNA-Talk ------------------------------------
Grant Hulbert
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Date search - yes or no (1997)
[TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997)
2.0 Info (1997)
Date problem still... (2004)
[WebDNA] Successful, working WebDNA7/CentOS install? (2013)
!!!!!!!!!!String Search!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (2001)
emailer settings and control questions (1997)
help testing quicktime delivery (1997)
relational db question (2002)
More Applescript (1997)
webcatalog [date] bug (1999)
RE: Just a thought (1998)
I'm having trouble using [url][interpret][math] together in lookup (1997)
Search returns all, not 20 (1997)
RE: Automatic Forwarding using WebCat (1997)
Other tags inside the founditems context? (1998)
Summing fields (1997)
ACGI processing for .html (1997)
Conditional searching & displaying (1997)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)