Re: [WebDNA] Sending 100 mails an hour then pausing
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2010
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 105991
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script just like you guys are discussing here. I posted it to the list in the late 90's, if you want (old archives). But Olin's kind of advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) =20= because the tendency to end up blacklisted is so much higher these =20 days than back then. Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later you find out =20= someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. And it is of =20= course understandable how that happens... everyone is sick of spam... =20= so anti-spam efforts proliferate, despite how obtuse they can be at =20 times. I am still always at least tempted to write my own, but on this =20 topic... I have a hard time ignoring the dangers. -Govinda > I never used the services Olin suggests but he's pretty smart so I'm =20= > sure they are worth considering. > If you still want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should =20 > work. I always fired them off one at a time but if your 100-per-=20 > batch code is working you may as well re-use it. > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > > I would recommend you use constant contact or vertical > > response. Likely you=92ll get higher delivery rates and > > you get lots of tracking to see which emails people > > click and view. --Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script = just like you guys are discussing here.
I posted it to the list in = the late 90's, if you want (old archives).
But Olin's kind of = advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) because the tendency = to end up blacklisted is so much higher these days than back = then.
Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later = you find out someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. = And it is of course understandable how that happens... = everyone is sick of spam... so anti-spam efforts proliferate, = despite how obtuse they can be at times.
I am still always at = least tempted to write my own, but on this topic... I have a hard time = ignoring the = dangers.
-Govinda
I never used the services Olin suggests but he's = pretty smart so I'm sure they are worth considering.
If you still = want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should work. I always fired = them off one at a time but if your 100-per-batch code is working you may = as well re-use it.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Grome
> I would recommend you use = constant contact or vertical
> response. Likely you=92ll get higher = delivery rates and
> you get lots of tracking to see which emails = people
> click and = view.
= --Apple-Mail-2-510411021--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script just like you guys are discussing here. I posted it to the list in the late 90's, if you want (old archives). But Olin's kind of advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) =20= because the tendency to end up blacklisted is so much higher these =20 days than back then. Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later you find out =20= someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. And it is of =20= course understandable how that happens... everyone is sick of spam... =20= so anti-spam efforts proliferate, despite how obtuse they can be at =20 times. I am still always at least tempted to write my own, but on this =20 topic... I have a hard time ignoring the dangers. -Govinda > I never used the services Olin suggests but he's pretty smart so I'm =20= > sure they are worth considering. > If you still want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should =20 > work. I always fired them off one at a time but if your 100-per-=20 > batch code is working you may as well re-use it. > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > > I would recommend you use constant contact or vertical > > response. Likely you=92ll get higher delivery rates and > > you get lots of tracking to see which emails people > > click and view. --Apple-Mail-2-510411021 Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also used to use a script = just like you guys are discussing here.
I posted it to the list in = the late 90's, if you want (old archives).
But Olin's kind of = advice comes up alot these days (on various lists) because the tendency = to end up blacklisted is so much higher these days than back = then.
Even when you thought you followed the rules, then later = you find out someone blacklisted you based on such-and-such criteria. = And it is of course understandable how that happens... = everyone is sick of spam... so anti-spam efforts proliferate, = despite how obtuse they can be at times.
I am still always at = least tempted to write my own, but on this topic... I have a hard time = ignoring the = dangers.
-Govinda
I never used the services Olin suggests but he's = pretty smart so I'm sure they are worth considering.
If you still = want to do it the WebDNA way your proposal should work. I always fired = them off one at a time but if your 100-per-batch code is working you may = as well re-use it.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Grome
> I would recommend you use = constant contact or vertical
> response. Likely you=92ll get higher = delivery rates and
> you get lots of tracking to see which emails = people
> click and = view.
= --Apple-Mail-2-510411021--
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Robert Minor duplicate mail (1997)
Cookies (1999)
WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
[WebDNA] WebDNA not interpreting for directory (2014)
Migrating to NT (1997)
Netscape v. IE (1997)
emailer settings and control questions (1997)
I give up!! (1997)
OT: Apache Question (2003)
IIS4 (1998)
Problems with date math (1997)
Counting records (2000)
Error: this shopping cart has already been submittedm (2004)
Hiding Email Addresses (2003)
I'm having trouble using [url][interpret][math] together in lookup (1997)
Security Tip (1996)
emailer w/F2 (1997)
Extended [ConvertChars] (1997)
Anyone running WebMerchant 4.0? (2000)