Re: [WebDNA] Performance impact of stock functions
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106697
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail-5--12478408 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii just as needed. ;-) I.e. i keep the functions as functions.. but in an include.. and include = only as I actually need them per page On 2011-05-31, at 12:17 PM, Tom Duke wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I'm planning to start putting a bunch on commonly used code into a = series of functions. Ideally I would like to include these in the = WebDNA FunctionDefs folder - but before I do that I'm wondering if there = is a major performance impact of doing that - i.e. loading up a 100k = file of functions onto every page. >=20 > If so how do others load up their library of functions. >=20 > Thanks > - Tom - Govinda -------------- Old WebDNA talklist archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/index.tpl?db=3Dwebdna-talk --Apple-Mail-5--12478408 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii just = as needed. ;-)
I.e. i keep the functions as = functions.. but in an include.. and include only as I actually need them = per page
On 2011-05-31, at 12:17 PM, Tom Duke = wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to start putting a = bunch on commonly used code into a series of functions. Ideally I = would like to include these in the WebDNA FunctionDefs folder - but = before I do that I'm wondering if there is a major performance impact of = doing that - i.e. loading up a 100k file of functions onto every = page.
If so how do others load up their library of = functions.
Thanks
- = Tom
- = Govinda
Old WebDNA = talklist archives:
= --Apple-Mail-5--12478408--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Apple-Mail-5--12478408 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii just as needed. ;-) I.e. i keep the functions as functions.. but in an include.. and include = only as I actually need them per page On 2011-05-31, at 12:17 PM, Tom Duke wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I'm planning to start putting a bunch on commonly used code into a = series of functions. Ideally I would like to include these in the = WebDNA FunctionDefs folder - but before I do that I'm wondering if there = is a major performance impact of doing that - i.e. loading up a 100k = file of functions onto every page. >=20 > If so how do others load up their library of functions. >=20 > Thanks > - Tom - Govinda -------------- Old WebDNA talklist archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/index.tpl?db=3Dwebdna-talk --Apple-Mail-5--12478408 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii just = as needed. ;-)
I.e. i keep the functions as = functions.. but in an include.. and include only as I actually need them = per page