Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 106991
interpreted = N
texte = >>> [snip]>>>> this:>>>> [math][cart]+1[/math]>>>>=20>>>> produces:>>>> 1.31108545312375e+16>>>>=20>>>> Is there any other way that I can get scientific notation out of =webdna?>>>>=20>>>> Thanks>>>=20>>>=20>>> Not for me. What version/platform of WebDNA are you running?>>=20>>=20>> version=3D6.0>> platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel RedHat>=20>=20>=20> I don't remember changing the math context in CICADA, so something is =not right here. I can multiply [cart] by 100 and still not get =scientific notation (*1000 does get there).>=20> Are you sure [math][cart]+1[/math] gives you the result you are =saying?positive. Just tested again:[math][cart]+1[/math]evaluated to:1.31110022015198e+16Anyway, I was asking if any of you guys have seen any *other* way to get =scientific notation out of webdna.. other than by using [math] on a long =number.. *wherever* the number may have come from.Thanks-Govinda= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Stuart Tremain 2011) Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011) Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011) Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011) Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Kenneth Grome 2011) Re: [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011) [WebDNA] Is [math] on a number with too many digits the only way that I can get scientific notation out of webdna? (Govinda 2011)

>>> [snip]>>>> this:>>>> [math][cart]+1[/math]>>>>=20>>>> produces:>>>> 1.31108545312375e+16>>>>=20>>>> Is there any other way that I can get scientific notation out of =webdna?>>>>=20>>>> Thanks>>>=20>>>=20>>> Not for me. What version/platform of WebDNA are you running?>>=20>>=20>> version=3D6.0>> platform=3Dunix-Linux Intel RedHat>=20>=20>=20> I don't remember changing the math context in CICADA, so something is =not right here. I can multiply [cart] by 100 and still not get =scientific notation (*1000 does get there).>=20> Are you sure [math][cart]+1[/math] gives you the result you are =saying?positive. Just tested again:[math][cart]+1[/math]evaluated to:1.31110022015198e+16Anyway, I was asking if any of you guys have seen any *other* way to get =scientific notation out of webdna.. other than by using [math] on a long =number.. *wherever* the number may have come from.Thanks-Govinda= Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Re:WebCatalog f2 Installation (1997) Windows-based Code Editor (2002) math problems (2000) More on the email templates (1997) WebCat2 as a chat server? (1997) security (1997) [WebDNA] possible bug? (db field named [width]) (2012) I try hard to think positively (1998) Format of Required fields error message (1997) expire headers in mac305b11 (1999) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) bug in [SendMail] (1997) Cookie set browser session. (1998) fix permissions on osx ... (2004) Logging purchases (1997) WebDNA on Intel Mac? (2006) The [shownext] limitations (2002) WebCat for Unix?? (1997) PC Authorize & Webmerchant (1998) Problem with shownext (2003)