Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107601
interpreted = N
texte = On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Govinda wrote: > for that matter I wonder how easy or hard it is to brute force current = webdna encrypted vals.? I mean the PHP clan has had to abandon md5() in = favor of crypt() (i.e. blowfish) in recent years+ due to the fact that = md5 is too easy to brute force reverse by today's computer power = standards. Webdna is going to need to address this too if we ever = become more popular than "security-through-obscurity". WebDNA has always been blowfish (at least it was when I last had a hand = in it). Plus salting and some other goodies, such as randomized keys, to = prevent brute-force reverse-engineering. You'll notice it doesn't = produce the same output twice if you encrypt the letter "a" twice in a = row. This is to help with dictionary attacks.= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Donovan Brooke 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Grant Hulbert 2011)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories ("Brian B. Burton" 2011)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Steve Raslevich -Northern Sound 2011)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Steve Raslevich -Northern Sound 2011)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Govinda 2011)
  13. [WebDNA] encrypt files/directories (Steve Raslevich -Northern Sound 2011)
On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Govinda wrote: > for that matter I wonder how easy or hard it is to brute force current = webdna encrypted vals.? I mean the PHP clan has had to abandon md5() in = favor of crypt() (i.e. blowfish) in recent years+ due to the fact that = md5 is too easy to brute force reverse by today's computer power = standards. Webdna is going to need to address this too if we ever = become more popular than "security-through-obscurity". WebDNA has always been blowfish (at least it was when I last had a hand = in it). Plus salting and some other goodies, such as randomized keys, to = prevent brute-force reverse-engineering. You'll notice it doesn't = produce the same output twice if you encrypt the letter "a" twice in a = row. This is to help with dictionary attacks.= Grant Hulbert

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Passing WebCat data to SSL server (1997) WebCat2b13 Command Reference Doc error (1997) [WebDNA] MATH shortcut (2014) Generating unique SKU from [cart] (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) [BULK] [WebDNA] Candidate versions release (2010) [ShowIf] a either fields are blank (1998) [OT] (waaaay OT) (2004) [WebDNA] WebDNA 7 on 8GB RAM server (2013) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997) SSL, WebSTAR, WebCatalog (1998) Interfacing WebMerchant to www.fedex.com (1997) default image if image in code not available (2003) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997) Extended [ConvertChars] (1997) Re2: AAgghh!! Help, please. SSL strikes again. (1997) possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997) all records returned. (1997) verify online (1997) Share cost of training videos! (1998)