Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108403
interpreted = N
texte = > Hi all, >=20 > I have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of = performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me = twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do = not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I = loose data - heavily. >=20 > So what is the best alternative to "Automatically commit databases to = disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT loosing any data. >=20 > Any good suggestions? >=20 Hi Palle Just use [commitdatabase...], in code, when where you want to be sure = the data in a db, in RAM, gets written to disk, like e.g. after a = [replace]/[append]. -G Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  11. [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
> Hi all, >=20 > I have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of = performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me = twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do = not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I = loose data - heavily. >=20 > So what is the best alternative to "Automatically commit databases to = disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT loosing any data. >=20 > Any good suggestions? >=20 Hi Palle Just use [commitdatabase...], in code, when where you want to be sure = the data in a db, in RAM, gets written to disk, like e.g. after a = [replace]/[append]. -G Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

redirect with frames (1997) textarea input truncated at 255 chars (1999) Prices Dropped (1998) hiding hyperlink info in URL field (1999) [FoundItems] solved - thanks (1997) search results through frames (2000) Resume Catalog ? (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) math on date? (1997) Secure Server (1997) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) formula's (1998) form data submission gets truncated (1997) Creating folders and deleting files (1997) $Replace with [founditems] (1997) Copy and paste text into form fields....... (2005) Displaying photo attached to first record (1997) Emailer setup (1997) no [include]s with encryption? (1998) Web Archives (2003)