Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108438
interpreted = N
texte = > The reason for my question above was to figure out if my next move = should be enabling or just taking on the task of doing a = after (more or less) all of my [append] or [replace] tags. >=20 > If I was to gain speed / performance by choosing one over the other = then that is what I am looking for. I don't know. Maybe someone (WSC?) has clocked the difference. =20 You might able to make the speed tests yourself, if you wanted. I am guessing it is the same internal mechanism, and so no speed = difference.. (assuming you put a [commitdatabase...] after *every* = write operation). Personally, if I wanted to be sure every write operation resulted in an = updated disk copy, I would not bother any more more than just turning on = the auto-commit feature. -G Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  11. [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
> The reason for my question above was to figure out if my next move = should be enabling or just taking on the task of doing a = after (more or less) all of my [append] or [replace] tags. >=20 > If I was to gain speed / performance by choosing one over the other = then that is what I am looking for. I don't know. Maybe someone (WSC?) has clocked the difference. =20 You might able to make the speed tests yourself, if you wanted. I am guessing it is the same internal mechanism, and so no speed = difference.. (assuming you put a [commitdatabase...] after *every* = write operation). Personally, if I wanted to be sure every write operation resulted in an = updated disk copy, I would not bother any more more than just turning on = the auto-commit feature. -G Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

User/pass with tcpconnect (2000) [WebDNA] Unsubscribe (2008) Emailer help....! (1997) Limit to Field Length in DB (1998) Separate SSL Server (1997) wc 2 pro users - sites, quotes wanted (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Emailer setup (1997) Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997) Mime Headers for Mail (1998) Associative lookup style? (1997) Trouble with my database (1998) Various Problems (1997) Date problems-more (1997) Stats (2004) [ot] Any One Want A WebDNA Billing Program? (2003) japanese characters (1997) [WebDNA] TCPDoh (2009) Pricing based on quantity (2000) [Sum] function? (1997)