[WebDNA] Re: shopping sites and the "old commerce tags"
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2012
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108694
interpreted = N
texte = >>=20>> does 7.0 for OSX 32bits -unofficially- include support for old =eCommerce tags?It would be nice if someone would build a new shopping system that does =not rely on commerce tags... =20...someone who:- currently needs the old commerce tags..=20- likes webdna and wants to stick with webdna..=20- who does not want to lose (or convert to another language) their =shopping site(s) because webdna eventually might not support legacy =commerce tags 100%... =20I am sure such a system would sell here. Lots of people keep popping up =here, who are in this boat.Probably no one is brave to do it, so far, because it takes alot of =work, and revealing our code to the world invites scrutiny.. and =everyone wants to be seen as doing a good job, or else keep it secret.. =20=BUT:- the work has to be done eventually ;-)- with just a little CSS, anything can be made to look like anything (so =what is the big risk?) =20A new system just needs to be basic, to start with anyway (enough to get =people to wean off the old commerce tags), .. and keep track of just =(expandable) cart header items.. and cart lineitem items... and simple =checkout. =20I don't have any shopping site projects lately.. and the legacy ones I =do have are already not reliant on commerce tags.. so I don't make time =to do it.. but I am encouraging someone to go for it! (someone who this =topic is current/relevant) =20FWIW-Govinda
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>>=20>> does 7.0 for OSX 32bits -unofficially- include support for old =eCommerce tags?It would be nice if someone would build a new shopping system that does =not rely on commerce tags... =20...someone who:- currently needs the old commerce tags..=20- likes webdna and wants to stick with webdna..=20- who does not want to lose (or convert to another language) their =shopping site(s) because webdna eventually might not support legacy =commerce tags 100%... =20I am sure such a system would sell here. Lots of people keep popping up =here, who are in this boat.Probably no one is brave to do it, so far, because it takes alot of =work, and revealing our code to the world invites scrutiny.. and =everyone wants to be seen as doing a good job, or else keep it secret.. =20=BUT:- the work has to be done eventually ;-)- with just a little CSS, anything can be made to look like anything (so =what is the big risk?) =20A new system just needs to be basic, to start with anyway (enough to get =people to wean off the old commerce tags), .. and keep track of just =(expandable) cart header items.. and cart lineitem items... and simple =checkout. =20I don't have any shopping site projects lately.. and the legacy ones I =do have are already not reliant on commerce tags.. so I don't make time =to do it.. but I am encouraging someone to go for it! (someone who this =topic is current/relevant) =20FWIW-Govinda
Govinda
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Mac 2.1b4 unknown error: BadSuffix (1997)
Multi-processor Mac info ... (1997)
Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)
Proposed FormVariables hierarchy (2000)
Emailer (1997)
Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997)
Outsourcing partnership ... (2005)
[SHOWIF AND/OR] (1997)
Emailer help....! (1997)
greater than or equal to (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
Search Order? (2000)
Uh...can someone help me out with the b10? (1997)
Cobalt and WebCatalog, do they work together? (2000)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
{Grouping} Docs (1999)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
Date Search (2004)
Thanks ! (1997)
Not really WebCat (1997)