[WebDNA] Speed test: Maxed out Mac mini
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2013
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110345
interpreted = N
texte = --Apple-Mail=_E9877C41-0DBC-429D-9975-1947913675D5Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/plain;charset=windows-1252Just a bit of an FYI / brag=85I just got our new Mac mini server set up. This is fully maxed out on =the Apple store - 2.6GHz i7, 16 GB RAM, dual 250GB SSD drives, $1999 US.Set up with WebDNA Server 6.2, and the first thing I did was pull out =the old WebDNA speed test:http://www.euca.us/webdnatest/show_speed.htmlThe previous top score was held by "Core2Duo E8400 @3.0ghz, 2GB Ram, =400GB SATA HDD, CentOS 5.3 (Final), Cicada 6.2 Apache 2.2.13"This mini will be replacing a 2.5 year old Mac mini server, spec'ed as =2.66GHz Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM, dual 7200 RPM 500GB disks.New miniOld miniOld =Record HolderTotal Ticks151191166=09% Improvement--26%10%In these results, the first 2 seconds of the test are simply a 2 second =delay used to see how many ticks are in 2 seconds, and has no bearing on =the system's performance. Subtracting out those 2 seconds, the results =are much more dramatic:New miniOld miniOld =Record HolderTest-Only Ticks307944% Improvement--163%47%The "Test-Only Ticks" results subtract out the first 121-122 ticks of =the test, which is simply a 2 second delay used to see how many ticks =are in 2 seconds, and has no bearing on the system's performance.I expect the performance difference will be even greater than this when =used with very large databases, due to the speed of the SSD, and with =multiple simultaneous requests, due to the additional processing cores.So far, very pleased. We have some upcoming projects that will involve =millions of database records, and this should provide enough performance =improvement to make that feasible.- Brian Fries=--Apple-Mail=_E9877C41-0DBC-429D-9975-1947913675D5Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/html;charset=windows-1252
Just =a bit of an FYI / brag=85
I just got our new Mac mini =server set up. This is fully maxed out on the Apple store - 2.6GHz i7, =16 GB RAM, dual 250GB SSD drives, $1999 US.
Set =up with WebDNA Server 6.2, and the first thing I did was pull out the =old WebDNA speed test:
The previous top =score was held by "Core2Duo E8400 =@3.0ghz, 2GB Ram, 400GB SATA HDD, CentOS 5.3 (Final), Cicada 6.2 Apache =2.2.13"
This mini will be =replacing a 2.5 year old Mac mini server, spec'ed as 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo, =4 GB RAM, dual 7200 RPM 500GB disks.
New =mini=Old miniOld =Record Holder
Total =Ticks=151=191=166=
% Improvement=--=26%=10%
In these results, the =first 2 seconds of the test are simply a 2 second delay used to see how many =ticks are in 2 seconds, and has no bearing on the system's performance. =Subtracting out those 2 seconds, the results are much more =dramatic:
=New miniOld miniOld =Record Holder
Test-Only =Ticks=30=79=44
% =Improvement=--=163%=47%
The "Test-Only Ticks" =results subtract out the first 121-122 ticks of the test, which is =simply a 2 second delay used to see how many ticks are in 2 =seconds, and has no bearing on the system's =performance.
I expect the performance =difference will be even greater than this when used with very large =databases, due to the speed of the SSD, and with multiple simultaneous =requests, due to the additional processing =cores.
So far, very pleased. We have some =upcoming projects that will involve millions of database records, and =this should provide enough performance improvement to make that =feasible.
- Brian Fries
=--Apple-Mail=_E9877C41-0DBC-429D-9975-1947913675D5--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
--Apple-Mail=_E9877C41-0DBC-429D-9975-1947913675D5Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/plain;charset=windows-1252Just a bit of an FYI / brag=85I just got our new Mac mini server set up. This is fully maxed out on =the Apple store - 2.6GHz i7, 16 GB RAM, dual 250GB SSD drives, $1999 US.Set up with WebDNA Server 6.2, and the first thing I did was pull out =the old WebDNA speed test:http://www.euca.us/webdnatest/show_speed.htmlThe previous top score was held by "Core2Duo E8400 @3.0ghz, 2GB Ram, =400GB SATA HDD, CentOS 5.3 (Final), Cicada 6.2 Apache 2.2.13"This mini will be replacing a 2.5 year old Mac mini server, spec'ed as =2.66GHz Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM, dual 7200 RPM 500GB disks.New miniOld miniOld =Record HolderTotal Ticks151191166=09% Improvement--26%10%In these results, the first 2 seconds of the test are simply a 2 second =delay used to see how many ticks are in 2 seconds, and has no bearing on =the system's performance. Subtracting out those 2 seconds, the results =are much more dramatic:New miniOld miniOld =Record HolderTest-Only Ticks307944% Improvement--163%47%The "Test-Only Ticks" results subtract out the first 121-122 ticks of =the test, which is simply a 2 second delay used to see how many ticks =are in 2 seconds, and has no bearing on the system's performance.I expect the performance difference will be even greater than this when =used with very large databases, due to the speed of the SSD, and with =multiple simultaneous requests, due to the additional processing cores.So far, very pleased. We have some upcoming projects that will involve =millions of database records, and this should provide enough performance =improvement to make that feasible.- Brian Fries=--Apple-Mail=_E9877C41-0DBC-429D-9975-1947913675D5Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableContent-Type: text/html;charset=windows-1252
Just =a bit of an FYI / brag=85
I just got our new Mac mini =server set up. This is fully maxed out on the Apple store - 2.6GHz i7, =16 GB RAM, dual 250GB SSD drives, $1999 US.
Set =up with WebDNA Server 6.2, and the first thing I did was pull out the =old WebDNA speed test:
The previous top =score was held by "Core2Duo E8400 =@3.0ghz, 2GB Ram, 400GB SATA HDD, CentOS 5.3 (Final), Cicada 6.2 Apache =2.2.13"
This mini will be =replacing a 2.5 year old Mac mini server, spec'ed as 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo, =4 GB RAM, dual 7200 RPM 500GB disks.
New =mini=Old miniOld =Record Holder
Total =Ticks=151=191=166=
% Improvement=--=26%=10%
In these results, the =first 2 seconds of the test are simply a 2 second delay used to see how many =ticks are in 2 seconds, and has no bearing on the system's performance. =Subtracting out those 2 seconds, the results are much more =dramatic:
=New miniOld miniOld =Record Holder
Test-Only =Ticks=30=79=44
% =Improvement=--=163%=47%
The "Test-Only Ticks" =results subtract out the first 121-122 ticks of the test, which is =simply a 2 second delay used to see how many ticks are in 2 =seconds, and has no bearing on the system's =performance.
I expect the performance =difference will be even greater than this when used with very large =databases, due to the speed of the SSD, and with multiple simultaneous =requests, due to the additional processing =cores.
So far, very pleased. We have some =upcoming projects that will involve millions of database records, and =this should provide enough performance improvement to make that =feasible.
- Brian Fries
=--Apple-Mail=_E9877C41-0DBC-429D-9975-1947913675D5--
Brian Fries
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebStar 4.2 issues (2000)
RE: Languages (1997)
Date search - yes or no (1997)
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
Multiple security dbs (1997)
Securing a Directory (2000)
Order file numbers diferent than the cart number. why? (2000)
Help! WebCat2 bug (Ben's input) (1997)
Is this possible in simple search? question? (1998)
RE:It just Does't add up!!! (1997)
calculating tax rates, mail order solutions and version 2 (1997)
Ok here is a question? (1997)
Date Help (2004)
[addlineitems] (1997)
tabs as delimiters (2004)
Editing Users.db (1997)
problems with 2 tags shakur (1997)
[WebDNA] Need to convert unix date? (2009)
shipcost (1997)
emailer don't work (1998)