[WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110474
interpreted = N
texte = --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on a new project that will require one of two options: 1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is one of our larger ones, too) 2) Make a new db that contains a primary key and the desired new field Which would be the most efficient or is there any difference in terms of performance? -- Alex Agnew IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com alex@knifecenters.com --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're working on a new project that will require one o= f two options:
1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is= one of our larger ones, too)
2) Make a new db that contains a pr= imary key and the desired new field

Which would be the most efficient or is there any diffe= rence in terms of performance?

--
= Alex Agnew
IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com
alex@knifecenters.com
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db (John Butler 2013)
  2. [WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db (Alex Agnew 2013)
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on a new project that will require one of two options: 1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is one of our larger ones, too) 2) Make a new db that contains a primary key and the desired new field Which would be the most efficient or is there any difference in terms of performance? -- Alex Agnew IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com alex@knifecenters.com --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're working on a new project that will require one o= f two options:
1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is= one of our larger ones, too)
2) Make a new db that contains a pr= imary key and the desired new field

Which would be the most efficient or is there any diffe= rence in terms of performance?

--
= Alex Agnew
IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com
alex@knifecenters.com
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f-- Alex Agnew

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

ReadDateFormat (1998) (OT) SERVER FREEZES ALL AT SAME TIME (2004) ShowNext for method=POST (1997) lookups (2000) Where is f2? (1997) showcart (2000) About to give up (1998) [isfile] ? (1997) simple forum/bboard (2004) Cart passing in URL... (2004) Thanks Grant (1997) Exclude by date - multiple (1997) RequiredFields template (1997) database files in secure folder (1997) Req: Row DB feature (2004) Separate SSL Server (1997) [WebDNA] PCI fubar (2012) SKU lookup (1997) CommitDatabase vs. CloseDatabase (2001) OT: zipcodes (2002)