[WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110474
interpreted = N
texte = --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on a new project that will require one of two options: 1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is one of our larger ones, too) 2) Make a new db that contains a primary key and the desired new field Which would be the most efficient or is there any difference in terms of performance? -- Alex Agnew IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com alex@knifecenters.com --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're working on a new project that will require one o= f two options:
1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is= one of our larger ones, too)
2) Make a new db that contains a pr= imary key and the desired new field

Which would be the most efficient or is there any diffe= rence in terms of performance?

--
= Alex Agnew
IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com
alex@knifecenters.com
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db (John Butler 2013)
  2. [WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db (Alex Agnew 2013)
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on a new project that will require one of two options: 1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is one of our larger ones, too) 2) Make a new db that contains a primary key and the desired new field Which would be the most efficient or is there any difference in terms of performance? -- Alex Agnew IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com alex@knifecenters.com --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're working on a new project that will require one o= f two options:
1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is= one of our larger ones, too)
2) Make a new db that contains a pr= imary key and the desired new field

Which would be the most efficient or is there any diffe= rence in terms of performance?

--
= Alex Agnew
IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com
alex@knifecenters.com
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f-- Alex Agnew

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

$Quit, $CloseDatabase corrections (1997) [WebDNA] problems sorting when using multiple words in the search field (2011) Unsubscribe (2006) WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997) Search results templates (1996) WebDNA for Dummies (2004) GetCookie name error in docs (2003) Shopping carts and reloading pages (1997) dreamweaver mx (2002) WebDNA Server (2007) Hiding HTML and page breaks (1997) WebCatalog for Mac 2.0.1 Released (1997) required fields (1998) Re:Variable Math (1998) Flash Applications (2003) Security Issue (1997) Sorting by highest number of matches unique to a field (2003) Two submit buttons ? (1997) WebCat Beta NT 18 (1997) Sorting error (1997)