[WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2013


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110474
interpreted = N
texte = --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on a new project that will require one of two options: 1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is one of our larger ones, too) 2) Make a new db that contains a primary key and the desired new field Which would be the most efficient or is there any difference in terms of performance? -- Alex Agnew IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com alex@knifecenters.com --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're working on a new project that will require one o= f two options:
1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is= one of our larger ones, too)
2) Make a new db that contains a pr= imary key and the desired new field

Which would be the most efficient or is there any diffe= rence in terms of performance?

--
= Alex Agnew
IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com
alex@knifecenters.com
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f-- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db (John Butler 2013)
  2. [WebDNA] Which is more efficient? New db or add to existing db (Alex Agnew 2013)
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on a new project that will require one of two options: 1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is one of our larger ones, too) 2) Make a new db that contains a primary key and the desired new field Which would be the most efficient or is there any difference in terms of performance? -- Alex Agnew IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com alex@knifecenters.com --047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're working on a new project that will require one o= f two options:
1) add a new field to one of our existing DBs (the db is= one of our larger ones, too)
2) Make a new db that contains a pr= imary key and the desired new field

Which would be the most efficient or is there any diffe= rence in terms of performance?

--
= Alex Agnew
IT/Web Developer - KnifeCenter.com
alex@knifecenters.com
--047d7b621a5ea3299404e012b54f-- Alex Agnew

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Emailer (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA autosuggest (2010) New Command prefs ... (1997) CC Merchant suggestions?? (1997) 2nd try: possible to weight results of grouped fields search? (1998) Error reading data -1 (1997) MacAuthorize hub, no modal password dialog? (1997) Multiple Users.db Possible? (1997) [WebDNA] [table] weirdness maybe? (2014) Closing Databases (take 2) (1998) japanese characters (1997) WebMerchant and AVS (1998) External Images (1998) [REFERRER] AND Truncation (1998) error: Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997) multi-paragraph fields (1997) problem (how to mark orders as 'opened') (1998) Spawn not working (1999) OT: Flash developer needed (2007)