Re: Nested tags count question
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11108
interpreted = N
texte = >> Had a page set up where the [search] [/search] was imbedded in the html >>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to >>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I >>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I >>created...hmmm. >> >>But my question is does an imbedded [search] [/search] take up more >>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering >>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future. >> >>Ken can you help me with this question > >Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of >a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels >of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with >the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all >the nested tags before it returns the html page. > >Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting >with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more >nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0 >and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's >why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0. > >I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with >the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but >I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know >enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a >faster web site. > >Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.comThanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it shows 11018K available to webcat.=============================================== Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com ===============================================
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>> Had a page set up where the
[search] [/search] was imbedded in the html >>and got the dreaded to many nested tags error with the plugin. Switched to >>a hyperlink search and was able to add more tags than I removed. By that I >>counted the [bracket] sets. If this was a fluke based on the page I >>created...hmmm. >> >>But my question is does an imbedded
[search] [/search] take up more >>overhead in the nested [tags] issue if anybody knows with out bothering >>overworked Grant. Would influence how I look at page layout in the future. >> >>Ken can you help me with this question > >Yes, I believe embedded searches add a level of nesting that's not part of >a forms-based search or a URL-based search. The nomber of possible levels >of nesting is not a fized number, either, instead I think it has to do with >the amount on memory the plugin uses - or has available - to interpret all >the nested tags before it returns the html page. > >Grant told me that the WebCatalog Plugin only has a tight limit on nesting >with WebSTAR 2.0 If you're using WebSTAR 1.3.2 then you can have more >nested tags. Apparently StarNine changed the memory code with WebSTAR 2.0 >and it allows less memory - or something like that - to its plugins, that's >why the WebCat plugin with 1.3.2 can support deeper nesting than with 2.0. > >I wanted to upgrade to WebSTAR 2.0 but I think my site will be faster with >the WebCAt plugin and 1.3.2 than with the WebCat acgi and WebStar 2.0 - but >I could be way off-base with this assumption, too ... I don't really know >enough about it, I just have the feeling that a faster WebCat will make a >faster web site. > >Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.comThanks, have given Webstar2.0 21 megs to allocate as much as possible to webcatalog plig-in on another issue I am fighting. Right this instant it shows 11018K available to webcat.=============================================== Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com ===============================================
grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter)
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Quick ShowIf question (1997)
When do we get to request new features? (1999)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)
WebCatalog Hosting (1996)
mac hack (1997)
sorry (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Client-side Image Maps and WebCat? (1998)
log out (2001)
[Reload mydata.db] (1998)
country of origin from IPADDRESS??? (2001)
database editor add field, etc. (2005)
Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997)
Date search and sendmail (1997)
WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997)
Hiding HTML and breaking the page (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
Group Updates (1998)