Re: Nested tags count question

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 11129
interpreted = N
texte = >>Grant, you mentioned that more memory helps with the number of simultaneous >>threads with the plugin ... How much more memory? Do you have any numbers >>or percentages we might use as guidelines to make sure we don't cheat >>WebCat out of any potential speed? > >WebSTAR has guidelines for plugins vs RAM. In general it's too complex for >me to come up with some kind of formula. I think you should make sure you >have about 12 bytes per record available for each threaded plugin >instance. Never mind, it's just too complex to predict. Just give >WebSTAR lots of RAM and watch its 'high-water' marker to see what's needed.If you're referring to that cute little green block in the WebSTAR status window, I don't see that anymore because I went back to 1.3.2 - after I ran into the problem of too few nested tags with the WebCat plugin. Do you have any ideas for checking the 'high-water' level with WebSTAR 1.3.2?Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  2. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  3. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  4. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  5. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  6. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  7. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  8. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  9. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  10. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  11. Re: Nested tags count question (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  12. Re: Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
  13. Re: Nested tags count question (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  14. Nested tags count question (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
>>Grant, you mentioned that more memory helps with the number of simultaneous >>threads with the plugin ... How much more memory? Do you have any numbers >>or percentages we might use as guidelines to make sure we don't cheat >>WebCat out of any potential speed? > >WebSTAR has guidelines for plugins vs RAM. In general it's too complex for >me to come up with some kind of formula. I think you should make sure you >have about 12 bytes per record available for each threaded plugin >instance. Never mind, it's just too complex to predict. Just give >WebSTAR lots of RAM and watch its 'high-water' marker to see what's needed.If you're referring to that cute little green block in the WebSTAR status window, I don't see that anymore because I went back to 1.3.2 - after I ran into the problem of too few nested tags with the WebCat plugin. Do you have any ideas for checking the 'high-water' level with WebSTAR 1.3.2?Sincerely, Ken Grome ..... ken@iav.com Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

lookup problem (2002) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997) Problems passing [SKU] with $Replace in 2.0 (1997) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Odd Cart Behavior (1997) Opposite of Summ=T? (2000) quotation marks needed? (2000) Frames and WebCat (1997) Encrypted links ... (2000) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997) [SubTotal] ??? (1998) Sku numbers (1997) [OT] Creating HTML Emails (not using WebDNA) (2003) acrobat -> wc (1998) formula.db question (1997) All choice in popups (1997) A simple email page? (1999) Summ=T Problem (1997)