[WebDNA] Cacheing include files

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2015


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 112184
interpreted = N
texte = Greetings! What is the WebDNA community doing for cacheing page fragment files? On = my website I have some pages that require significant processing to = generate the visible content. To save time, I only render it out the = processing intense parts once an hour or day or whatever (as required). = I save this out as a fragment of HTML in a file (with an .inc or .frag = extension) An example of this might be a database of books, and I need to create a = page that has as html links, a list of unique authors and a count of = books attributed to that author. Rather then do this every time the page = is requested, i first check to see if the fragment exists, then check to = see if it=E2=80=99s current, and then if both of those are false I = render out the html, save it in a new fragment file, and display it to = the user.=20 SO.. here=E2=80=99s my question: the fragments are saved as .inc or = .frag. WebDNA does not cache these as they are neither templates nor = databases. This causes a lot of disk activity as I use fragments = extensively to speed up the the quasi-static parts of the website. How = can I get webdna to cache these? I am hesitant to add the extensions to = the template field in the settings. I do not want the fragment under any = circumstance to be able to be directly accessed by a web visitor. Should = I block the extension from being served by Apache? Would it be possible = to get a third cache field type in the webdna settings? Thoughts? = Suggestions?=20 Thanks! Brian B.= Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Donovan Brooke 2015)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Stuart Tremain 2015)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Brian Burton 2015)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Kenneth Grome 2015)
  5. [WebDNA] Cacheing include files (Brian Burton 2015)
Greetings! What is the WebDNA community doing for cacheing page fragment files? On = my website I have some pages that require significant processing to = generate the visible content. To save time, I only render it out the = processing intense parts once an hour or day or whatever (as required). = I save this out as a fragment of HTML in a file (with an .inc or .frag = extension) An example of this might be a database of books, and I need to create a = page that has as html links, a list of unique authors and a count of = books attributed to that author. Rather then do this every time the page = is requested, i first check to see if the fragment exists, then check to = see if it=E2=80=99s current, and then if both of those are false I = render out the html, save it in a new fragment file, and display it to = the user.=20 SO.. here=E2=80=99s my question: the fragments are saved as .inc or = .frag. WebDNA does not cache these as they are neither templates nor = databases. This causes a lot of disk activity as I use fragments = extensively to speed up the the quasi-static parts of the website. How = can I get webdna to cache these? I am hesitant to add the extensions to = the template field in the settings. I do not want the fragment under any = circumstance to be able to be directly accessed by a web visitor. Should = I block the extension from being served by Apache? Would it be possible = to get a third cache field type in the webdna settings? Thoughts? = Suggestions?=20 Thanks! Brian B.= Brian Burton

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Error: Permision deny. (2005) Public beta 2 for WebCatalog 4.0 is now available. (2000) Changing to a windows mounted share from a Mac OS X machine (2002) how to get [protect] tag from webcat3b3 to 3.03 on IIS working (1998) PCS Frames-Default page is solution! (1997) Date or time comparisons have bugs ... (1998) Almost a there but..bye bye NetCloak (1997) command parameters (1998) Site / Database Structure (2002) Bug Report, maybe (1997) Great product and great job ! (1997) Statistics... (2004) Mac Vs WindowsNT (1997) WC1.6 to WC2 date formatting (1997) Which GUI HTML editors work with WC ? (1997) RE: Switching To NT (1999) Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (1997) WC 2.0 frames feature (1997) How bad an idea is it to put cart=[cart] on all links? (2000) Multi-pay? (2003)