Re: [WebDNA] WordPress plugin

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2020


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 115152
interpreted = N
texte = 2781 --Apple-Mail=_62CC52F0-7098-4696-AAB2-ADFE4CF54FDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 FANTASTIC !!! Kind regards Stuart Tremain Pharoah Lane Software AUSTRALIA webdna@plsoftware.com.au > On 28 Jul 2020, at 15:57, talk@webdna.us wrote: >=20 > Hello everyone, >=20 > We are currently working on such a solution. Multiple copies of WebDNA = on several servers would either be able to share a single database on a = single server, and/or to locally replicate a database from a server A to = a server B. >=20 > This is a major update that we are working on and it might be our = WebDNA 9.0. >=20 > Stay tuned :-) >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Jul 28, 2020, at 01:36, talk@webdna.us wrote: >>=20 >> The big advantage to having a standalone db system is that you can = have a multi server (not website), one database system that you see on = busy websites, unfortunately WebDNA does not support this model =E2=80=98o= ut of the box=E2=80=99. I have considered building a system to support = this but have not had the time and have stuck with WebDNA & MySQL, and = consequently such with WebDNA 8.2 server edition, would love to see = MySQL or MariaDB or PostgreSQL integrated into the new WebDNA editions. >>=20 >> I think that the requirements to convert MySQL queries to WebDNA is = probably not too hard on first glance but there are things that MySQL = natively can do that WebDNA would need to be programmed to do. >>=20 >> In developing a WebDNA dB to replace MySQL for Wordpress you would = have to be able to replicate all the aspects of MySQL and I think for = the market that you are considering ie Wordpress/MySQL, would just = ignore it.=20 >>=20 >> As much as I love WebDNA it does have it limitations when it comes to = large data. >>=20 >> The most common website config is MySQL/PHP on Linux servers (LAMP), = I would love to see a common LAW solution (Linux And WebDNA). >>=20 >> The biggest thing that I would like to see is a multi server/single = db solution for WebDNA. >>=20 >>=20 >> Kind regards >>=20 >> Stuart Tremain >> Pharoah Lane Software >> AUSTRALIA >> webdna@plsoftware.com.au >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 28 Jul 2020, at 08:08, talk@webdna.us wrote: >>>=20 >>> WordPress uses MySQL, or whatever database it=E2=80=99s configured = for. Why couldn=E2=80=99t WebDNA be packaged as a plugin for WordPress = which would replace the database connection with its own fast, RAM = system? >>>=20 >>> Even if you completely ignored it=E2=80=99s fantastic scripting = language, simply configuring a FastGCI WordPress plugin to shuffle data = requests between the CMS and RAM based data, it would dramatically speed = up WordPress. >>>=20 >>> Future versions might expand to include a way to edit content using = the WebDNA interpreter, but that can be an entirely separate project. >>>=20 >>> Currently, the entire world seems hypnotized into believing that = there needs to be a separate database software system and that=E2=80=99s = antiquated nonsense. There=E2=80=99s certainly needs to be structured = data, but requiring it flow over a serialized, disk-centric serial model = that only made sense with a mainframe is hopeless. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list talk@webdna.us >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us >>> archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 >>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list = talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: = http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list talk@webdna.us > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us > archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_62CC52F0-7098-4696-AAB2-ADFE4CF54FDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 FANTASTIC !!!



Kind regards

Stuart Tremain
Pharoah Lane Software
AUSTRALIA







On 28 Jul 2020, at 15:57, talk@webdna.us wrote:

Hello = everyone,

We are currently working on such = a solution. Multiple copies of WebDNA on several servers would either be = able to share a single database on a single server, and/or to locally = replicate a database from a server A to a server B.

This is a major update that we are working on and it might be = our WebDNA 9.0.

Stay tuned :-)

- chris






On Jul 28, 2020, at = 01:36, talk@webdna.us = wrote:

The big advantage to having a = standalone db system is that you can have a multi server (not website), = one database system that you see on busy websites, unfortunately WebDNA = does not support this model =E2=80=98out of the box=E2=80=99. I have = considered building a system to support this but have not had the time = and have stuck with WebDNA & MySQL, and consequently such with = WebDNA 8.2 server edition, would love to see MySQL or MariaDB or = PostgreSQL integrated into the new WebDNA editions.

I think that the requirements to convert MySQL queries to = WebDNA is probably not too hard on first glance but there are things = that MySQL natively can do that WebDNA would need to be programmed to = do.

In developing a WebDNA dB  to = replace MySQL for Wordpress you would have to be able to replicate all = the aspects of MySQL and I think for the market that you are considering = ie Wordpress/MySQL, would just ignore it.

As= much as I love WebDNA it does have it limitations when it comes to = large data.

The most common website config = is MySQL/PHP on Linux servers (LAMP), I would love to see a common LAW = solution (Linux And WebDNA).

The biggest = thing that I would like to see is a multi server/single db solution for = WebDNA.


Kind regards

Stuart Tremain
Pharoah Lane = Software
AUSTRALIA
webdna@plsoftware.com.au






On 28 Jul 2020, at = 08:08, talk@webdna.us wrote:

WordPress uses = MySQL, or whatever database it=E2=80=99s configured for.  Why = couldn=E2=80=99t WebDNA be packaged as a plugin for WordPress which = would replace the database connection with its own fast, RAM system?

Even if you completely ignored it=E2=80=99s = fantastic scripting language, simply configuring a FastGCI WordPress = plugin to shuffle data requests between the CMS and RAM based data, it = would dramatically speed up WordPress.

Future= versions might expand to include a way to edit content using the WebDNA = interpreter, but that can be an entirely separate project.

Currently, the entire world seems hypnotized = into believing that there needs to be a separate database software = system and that=E2=80=99s antiquated nonsense.  There=E2=80=99s = certainly needs to be structured data, but requiring it flow over a = serialized, disk-centric serial model that only made sense with a = mainframe is hopeless.


---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list talk@webdna.us
To unsubscribe, = E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us
archives: = http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55
Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us

--------------------------------------------------------- = This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing = list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us = archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us

---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list talk@webdna.us
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = talk-leave@webdna.us
archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55
Bug= Reporting: support@webdna.us

= --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_62CC52F0-7098-4696-AAB2-ADFE4CF54FDB-- . Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] WordPress plugin (Palle Bo Nielsen 2020)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] WordPress plugin (Michael Davis 2020)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] WordPress plugin (Stuart Tremain 2020)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] WordPress plugin (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2020)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] WordPress plugin (Stuart Tremain 2020)
  6. [WebDNA] WordPress plugin (Patrick McCormick 2020)
2781 --Apple-Mail=_62CC52F0-7098-4696-AAB2-ADFE4CF54FDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 FANTASTIC !!! Kind regards Stuart Tremain Pharoah Lane Software AUSTRALIA webdna@plsoftware.com.au > On 28 Jul 2020, at 15:57, talk@webdna.us wrote: >=20 > Hello everyone, >=20 > We are currently working on such a solution. Multiple copies of WebDNA = on several servers would either be able to share a single database on a = single server, and/or to locally replicate a database from a server A to = a server B. >=20 > This is a major update that we are working on and it might be our = WebDNA 9.0. >=20 > Stay tuned :-) >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Jul 28, 2020, at 01:36, talk@webdna.us wrote: >>=20 >> The big advantage to having a standalone db system is that you can = have a multi server (not website), one database system that you see on = busy websites, unfortunately WebDNA does not support this model =E2=80=98o= ut of the box=E2=80=99. I have considered building a system to support = this but have not had the time and have stuck with WebDNA & MySQL, and = consequently such with WebDNA 8.2 server edition, would love to see = MySQL or MariaDB or PostgreSQL integrated into the new WebDNA editions. >>=20 >> I think that the requirements to convert MySQL queries to WebDNA is = probably not too hard on first glance but there are things that MySQL = natively can do that WebDNA would need to be programmed to do. >>=20 >> In developing a WebDNA dB to replace MySQL for Wordpress you would = have to be able to replicate all the aspects of MySQL and I think for = the market that you are considering ie Wordpress/MySQL, would just = ignore it.=20 >>=20 >> As much as I love WebDNA it does have it limitations when it comes to = large data. >>=20 >> The most common website config is MySQL/PHP on Linux servers (LAMP), = I would love to see a common LAW solution (Linux And WebDNA). >>=20 >> The biggest thing that I would like to see is a multi server/single = db solution for WebDNA. >>=20 >>=20 >> Kind regards >>=20 >> Stuart Tremain >> Pharoah Lane Software >> AUSTRALIA >> webdna@plsoftware.com.au >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 28 Jul 2020, at 08:08, talk@webdna.us wrote: >>>=20 >>> WordPress uses MySQL, or whatever database it=E2=80=99s configured = for. Why couldn=E2=80=99t WebDNA be packaged as a plugin for WordPress = which would replace the database connection with its own fast, RAM = system? >>>=20 >>> Even if you completely ignored it=E2=80=99s fantastic scripting = language, simply configuring a FastGCI WordPress plugin to shuffle data = requests between the CMS and RAM based data, it would dramatically speed = up WordPress. >>>=20 >>> Future versions might expand to include a way to edit content using = the WebDNA interpreter, but that can be an entirely separate project. >>>=20 >>> Currently, the entire world seems hypnotized into believing that = there needs to be a separate database software system and that=E2=80=99s = antiquated nonsense. There=E2=80=99s certainly needs to be structured = data, but requiring it flow over a serialized, disk-centric serial model = that only made sense with a mainframe is hopeless. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list talk@webdna.us >>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us >>> archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 >>> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list = talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: = http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list talk@webdna.us > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us > archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_62CC52F0-7098-4696-AAB2-ADFE4CF54FDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 FANTASTIC !!!



Kind regards

Stuart Tremain
Pharoah Lane Software
AUSTRALIA







On 28 Jul 2020, at 15:57, talk@webdna.us wrote:

Hello = everyone,

We are currently working on such = a solution. Multiple copies of WebDNA on several servers would either be = able to share a single database on a single server, and/or to locally = replicate a database from a server A to a server B.

This is a major update that we are working on and it might be = our WebDNA 9.0.

Stay tuned :-)

- chris






On Jul 28, 2020, at = 01:36, talk@webdna.us = wrote:

The big advantage to having a = standalone db system is that you can have a multi server (not website), = one database system that you see on busy websites, unfortunately WebDNA = does not support this model =E2=80=98out of the box=E2=80=99. I have = considered building a system to support this but have not had the time = and have stuck with WebDNA & MySQL, and consequently such with = WebDNA 8.2 server edition, would love to see MySQL or MariaDB or = PostgreSQL integrated into the new WebDNA editions.

I think that the requirements to convert MySQL queries to = WebDNA is probably not too hard on first glance but there are things = that MySQL natively can do that WebDNA would need to be programmed to = do.

In developing a WebDNA dB  to = replace MySQL for Wordpress you would have to be able to replicate all = the aspects of MySQL and I think for the market that you are considering = ie Wordpress/MySQL, would just ignore it.

As= much as I love WebDNA it does have it limitations when it comes to = large data.

The most common website config = is MySQL/PHP on Linux servers (LAMP), I would love to see a common LAW = solution (Linux And WebDNA).

The biggest = thing that I would like to see is a multi server/single db solution for = WebDNA.


Kind regards

Stuart Tremain
Pharoah Lane = Software
AUSTRALIA
webdna@plsoftware.com.au






On 28 Jul 2020, at = 08:08, talk@webdna.us wrote:

WordPress uses = MySQL, or whatever database it=E2=80=99s configured for.  Why = couldn=E2=80=99t WebDNA be packaged as a plugin for WordPress which = would replace the database connection with its own fast, RAM system?

Even if you completely ignored it=E2=80=99s = fantastic scripting language, simply configuring a FastGCI WordPress = plugin to shuffle data requests between the CMS and RAM based data, it = would dramatically speed up WordPress.

Future= versions might expand to include a way to edit content using the WebDNA = interpreter, but that can be an entirely separate project.

Currently, the entire world seems hypnotized = into believing that there needs to be a separate database software = system and that=E2=80=99s antiquated nonsense.  There=E2=80=99s = certainly needs to be structured data, but requiring it flow over a = serialized, disk-centric serial model that only made sense with a = mainframe is hopeless.


---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list talk@webdna.us
To unsubscribe, = E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us
archives: = http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55
Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us

--------------------------------------------------------- = This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing = list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us = archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us

---------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list talk@webdna.us
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = talk-leave@webdna.us
archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55
Bug= Reporting: support@webdna.us

= --------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list talk@webdna.us To unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.us archives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55 Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us --Apple-Mail=_62CC52F0-7098-4696-AAB2-ADFE4CF54FDB-- . Stuart Tremain

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[protect admin] (1997) Field names beginning with Reg.. (2002) Add more fields to an existent data base (1997) email preferences on NT (1997) WebCat2b13MacPlugin - nested [xxx] contexts (1997) dates and hex formatting (1997) Looking up two prices in database? (1997) Search or Lookup before Append (1998) Error.html (1997) [Shell] not relative (2000) Bug alert! (1997) sorting and summarizing (1998) Limitations on fields? Server is crashing (1997) WebCat for Unix?? (1997) Lost Records in Database (2001) Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997) RE: creating writefile data from a nested search (1997) [WebDNA] agree? --> [url] broken inside [redirect], on a square-bracket-style include, included from a XML-style page (2009) Me know logical no need (2002) SiteEdit NewFile.html ? (1997)