[WebDNA] WordPress plugin
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2020
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 115149
interpreted = N
texte = 2778WordPress uses MySQL, or whatever database it=E2=80=99s configured for. =Why couldn=E2=80=99t WebDNA be packaged as a plugin for WordPress which =would replace the database connection with its own fast, RAM system?Even if you completely ignored it=E2=80=99s fantastic scripting =language, simply configuring a FastGCI WordPress plugin to shuffle data =requests between the CMS and RAM based data, it would dramatically speed =up WordPress.Future versions might expand to include a way to edit content using the =WebDNA interpreter, but that can be an entirely separate project.Currently, the entire world seems hypnotized into believing that there =needs to be a separate database software system and that=E2=80=99s =antiquated nonsense. There=E2=80=99s certainly needs to be structured =data, but requiring it flow over a serialized, disk-centric serial model =that only made sense with a mainframe is hopeless.---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list talk@webdna.usTo unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.usarchives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us.
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
2778WordPress uses MySQL, or whatever database it=E2=80=99s configured for. =Why couldn=E2=80=99t WebDNA be packaged as a plugin for WordPress which =would replace the database connection with its own fast, RAM system?Even if you completely ignored it=E2=80=99s fantastic scripting =language, simply configuring a FastGCI WordPress plugin to shuffle data =requests between the CMS and RAM based data, it would dramatically speed =up WordPress.Future versions might expand to include a way to edit content using the =WebDNA interpreter, but that can be an entirely separate project.Currently, the entire world seems hypnotized into believing that there =needs to be a separate database software system and that=E2=80=99s =antiquated nonsense. There=E2=80=99s certainly needs to be structured =data, but requiring it flow over a serialized, disk-centric serial model =that only made sense with a mainframe is hopeless.---------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed tothe mailing list talk@webdna.usTo unsubscribe, E-mail to: talk-leave@webdna.usarchives: http://www.webdna.us/page.dna?numero=3D55Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us.
Patrick McCormick
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
File Uploads... (1997)
Snake Bites (1997)
Re(6): Small Bug: ErrorLog.txt/[FORMVARIABLES]/[ORDERFILE] (1998)
[WebDNA] WebDNA glitch, no response required ... (2009)
Multiple Ad databases? (1997)
Follow-Up to: Removing [showif] makes a big difference in speed (1997)
Searching Groups for multiple matches (1998)
Help SM: Duplicate cart #'s - still! (2003)
Running _every_ page through WebCat ? (1997)
Faxing orders in place of email (1997)
Color options for items (1999)
database size? (1997)
Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997)
[append] vs. [appendfile] delta + question? (1997)
Summing fields (1997)
Speaking of Rediret (2004)
input problem (1999)
Way Off Topic (2003)
OFF-TOPIC: Stop reloading SRC page from cache ... (2003)
OT: CSS and Positioning (2001)